You TV? [Archive] - HawaiiThreads.com

tutusue

April 22nd, 2007, 08:06 PM

That is just waaaaaay toooooo coooool!

What I don't understand is I got the following message as the site was loading:
"This applet was signed by "Philippe Detournay," and authenticated by "GlobalSign nv-sa". Do you trust this certificate?

Click trust to run this applet and allow it unrestricted access to your computer. Click Don't Trust to run this applet with standard Java restrictions."

(btw...the certificate has expired!)

Since I haven't broken bread or sipped wine with Philippe, I clicked "Don't Trust"! What might've been different if I'd clicked "Trust"? Would that mean Philippe and I were going steady? :D

Seriously, I didn't know what that message meant. <shrug>

Lei K

April 22nd, 2007, 08:09 PM

^^ Got the same thing tutu, clicked don't trust as well.

tutusue

April 22nd, 2007, 08:10 PM

Hey folks...ya call in via a regular phone. Ryan had the phone number and conference code on the web site. If I understood him correctly, the phone call was separate from UStream. He had his cell on speaker phone so everyone could hear and/or participate via a conference call.

So techie, that Ryan!!!

helen

April 22nd, 2007, 08:15 PM

Took me a while to figure out the telephone conference call. I was watching the full screen version of the video feed and I didn't see that phone number. That phone number was on the Ustream page that was originally linked from Ryan.

Took a couple of tries for me. I tried my cell phone first but no one could hear my clearly so then I tried my home phone.

tutusue

April 22nd, 2007, 08:45 PM

[...]I was watching the full screen version of the video feed[...]
There was a full screen option??? Jeez, see how untechie I am!

pzarquon

April 22nd, 2007, 08:51 PM

Whee! That was fun. Folks from around the island, and on the Mainland, tuning in to enjoy a Haleiwa sunset.

I kept streaming most of the way home, too, though both the conference call and video stream died eventually.

Yeah, Tutusue, you'd have to trust that guy to get the chat to work. It's an applet written by an independent developer and I guess he's not certified or expired or something. That's the difference between most folks and total geeks, I guess... We click "OK" and damn the torpedos! (And sometimes regret it.)

We'll have to do it again sometime. I plan to livecast rush hour traffic sometime this week for the heck of it. Show those Hawaii dreamers what the workaday life in "paradise" really involves! :)

blueyecicle

April 22nd, 2007, 08:56 PM

That was very cool. I need to learn how. I have a cam on my new laptop.

Quark

April 22nd, 2007, 09:02 PM

That was good fun Ryan. Almost like being there without the sandy feet. Please twitter your next outing.

tutusue

April 22nd, 2007, 09:09 PM

Whee! That was fun. [...]Yeah, Tutusue, you'd have to trust that guy to get the chat to work. It's an applet written by an independent developer and I guess he's not certified or expired or something. That's the difference between most folks and total geeks, I guess... We click "OK" and damn the torpedos! (And sometimes regret it.)[...]
Aha! That's what the applet's for...to chat! I like your phone feature better! The delay was interesting, tho'. I could hear myself! Kinda weird!

Just when I think technology has outdone itself, it outdoes itself again! Ooooh, to have the time to learn and play with it! I'm still looking forward to my first YouTube upload...if it's still around by the time I'm able to give it a try!

mel

April 22nd, 2007, 10:45 PM

I joined Ryan and his family for a morning near the beach, a drive through Waikiki and into McCully and a stop and lunch at Stadium Park though the virtual Ustream "broadcast". I also experienced some of the problems with the chat feature on Ustream.... and I did click "yes" for the certificate verification thing.... Without downloading a new java update, the Ustream managed to work in chat mode about halfway through the time I watched, though there was a lag in typing stuff in...and once my Firefox crashed.

And while the Ustream live broadcasts or "lifecast" as Ryan has termed them in his blog, there will be ethical and privacy issues that will prevail as the technology becomes adopted by more people.

pzarquon

April 22nd, 2007, 10:54 PM

Oh, definitely things will get hairy quickly. Justin has already been thrown out of the GAP, has had encounters with people who don't want to be filmed, and can't do everyday things like watch TV or go to the movies (at least not without making lawyers nervous). I'm cautious enough, being up front about the camera and sticking to largely public spaces, but not everyone will be. Wait 'til high school kids start doing this from classrooms... or bathrooms.

With dozens of people walking around with cameras, streaming live, it's only a matter of time before a crime is committed in front of or involving them, or when a litigious-minded stranger finds a good excuse for a lawsuit. But, this early on the curve, it's all experimental and crazy and learn as you go. And I'm having a blast.

I have no doubt the lawyers will ruin the fun, just as they have for other spectacular evolutionary steps in the history of the Internet... so I'm going to have my fun right now!

For those that missed today's Haleiwa sunset, here's a video clip recorded by a viewer on the Mainland:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aa5M6XDsRQ0

Here's a clip from earlier in the day, when we were using an alternate service (it was awful) as we drove down Kalakaua Avenue, again recorded by a friend thousands of miles away:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7SAAro4q5E

scrivener

April 22nd, 2007, 11:31 PM

I'm interested in some of the educational applications a thing like this might have, but while the portability is certainly cool, it's the immediacy that makes it what it is, and I'm wondering how that might be of use.

During the sunset chat, Tutusue brought up the possibility of doing casting calls this way, setting up for clients on the mainland and parading auditioners through the video screen.

I'm interested in playing around with it, hoping some practical application will reveal itself. I'm not optimistic, but yeah. I'll play around with it too.

I don't like the idea of paying fifty bucks a month for EVDO service, especially when I'm paying forty bucks a month already for the 3G data service on my cell phone (that's in addition to the forty bucks a month for the phone service).

tutusue

April 23rd, 2007, 12:03 AM

I'd be thrilled at learning how to stream a Makaha sunset! :D

Heck...I have old-fashion miniDV video of Christa and Jacquie creating Starbuck's palm trees on my office door. I'd be thrilled to have the time to edit the footage, add music and learn how to upload to YouTube! :o

pzarquon

April 23rd, 2007, 07:04 AM

There are all kinds of practical applications for this. I used to do conference planning, and we used to pay six figures to have live streaming video from our various panels around the Pacific Rim... and it wasn't the whole Internet on the other end, just other remote offices. I can see smaller outfits finally being able to make their presentations available to the world at reasonable cost.

Yes, some conferences will have to specifically ban cameras if they want to enforce exclusivity of attendance... but most forward-thinking gatherings will go for something like this.

Like all great technologies, this stuff will provide immense amounts of entertainment, education, commerce, and yes, trouble. I can't wait to see it all.

By the way, Ustream also has its "official" video archive of part of yesterday's sunset. You can hear some of the conversation and watch the insanity.

http://www.ustream.tv/mystuff/NURNLnr1PsaZ3NEKaTNn1A

Whee!

pzarquon

April 23rd, 2007, 07:24 AM

By the way, I'm going to be turning on the camera randomly, so tune in if you're bored and you might catch me out and about. Like now, heading into rush hour traffic. May have something for you for lunch, too... :D

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/hawaii

christa

April 23rd, 2007, 08:22 AM

...AND people who twitter will get to know as it happens.

(yes i finally got onboard with the the twit!)

pzarquon

April 23rd, 2007, 11:18 AM

Man. If there was anyone in Hawaii whose life should be broadcast live over the internet, it's Christa's. I mean... how much fun would all this be (http://honolulund.blogspot.com/) to watch as it happens?

I feel like going someplace scenic for lunch. Kakaako Waterfront Park? Ala Moana Beach Park? Tune in 'round noon (http://www.ustream.tv/channel/hawaii) Hawaii time. I'll try not to chew too loud.

scrivener

April 23rd, 2007, 12:54 PM

Pz made a comment during his driving-around Waikiki stream about how his interest in podcasting has chillede a bit since his discovery of video casting and live video streaming. I found this very interesting.

As has been discussed, one of the beauties of podcasting is the I'll-listen-when-I-have-time feature. If you subscribe to a cast, iTunes sucks it down to your computer when a new episode is available, and if you sync your iPod regularly, it sucks it down to your iPod and you just sorta discover it there. When you're ready.

While I can't say I didn't enjoy the live video stream, I found myself resenting having to watch it at that moment if I wanted to watch it at all. So the big difference here is the immediacy of steaming vs. the delayability of podcasting, and the reason I'm musing about all this here and now is I'm wondering about the future of podcasting, which was supposed to be the Next Big Thing. The 'Net changes so quickly, of course, that it's hard to even say if the Next Big Thing exists.

jkpescador

April 23rd, 2007, 01:27 PM

What happens if you go to a concert?

Can you walk through an airport like that?

Would this hurt your security clearance if you had one?

Just throwing this out for discussion.

pzarquon will you stream yourself watching Lost? Your reactions would be interesting. :)

What about streaming kids activities? Now the whole family can watch.

pzarquon

April 23rd, 2007, 01:30 PM

So the big difference here is the immediacy of steaming vs. the delayability of podcasting, and the reason I'm musing about all this here and now is I'm wondering about the future of podcasting, which was supposed to be the Next Big Thing.I'm a TiVo fanatic, and a podcast lover, so you bet your sweet bippy I love all that delicious time-shiftiness. I don't want to watch a TV show or listen to a radio show when the network deigns to air it, or sit through ads I don't have to. I want to have it all on-demand, neatly organized, and easily manipulated.

So I don't see "live" as a replacement for "walkaway content," as one podcaster likes to say. In my head it is, at the moment, as the current obsession, but that hardly means I think it's The Next Big Thing or even along the same spectrum as podcasts.

But "live" offers that little bit of magic that live radio and live TV has, and that's interactivity. As a content creator, it's much more gratifying in many ways to be able to interact with the audience. I'm not bundling something up and sending it out, waiting for it to be digested before getting a response (if at all). I'm right there with listeners and viewers, and they're contributing just as much as I am, helping steer the conversation, making for a richer experience for everyone. Listeners and viewers certainly feel that.

And again, it's not an either-or proposition. Produced content, edited and prepared content, is just a different beast entirely. Some things benefit from the editing process. Some content requires the uninterrupted, first-person voice. And live podcasts can be recorded, edited, archived and shared. I never make it to my favorite podcasts' live calls, but I still like listening to them.

So I certainly wouldn't "resent" being forced to tune in at a given time or date. If I can make it, I will. But smart content creators know that there's still a place for produced stuff, archived stuff, and if not, there's plenty of other podcasts, vlogs, and streaming video channels in the sea.

Besides. A "show" doesn't have to be a "show" in the conventional sense of the word. At the moment, I'm finishing up my lunch while parked under a tree at Ala Moana Park. I'm not saying anything, but there are 13 people quietly enjoying the scene (http://www.ustream.tv/channel/hawaii) (and the passing surfer girls and guys) with me.Just throwing this out for discussion.
These are all discussions we're having, to be sure. See earlier in this thread. Private facilities have differing policies on photography, let alone live video. Some conferences would welcome open access, others will fear it. There are already issues with watching TV, listening to the radio, or going to the movies... as you'd be "rebroadcasting" copyrighted content. I can't wait for the first lifecaster to try to get into a MLB or NFL game. They probably won't.

Pua'i Mana'o

April 23rd, 2007, 03:16 PM

A recent conversation I had:

there are young, talented people in Hawaii who want to get their little tv shows on tv™. Before, the playing field meant that they had to knock on the local networks, public access or OC16 and play the game to get airtime and then push press releases to get buzz going and drive viewership.

Nowadays, tinkering with going straight to $1.99 downloads per episode on iTunes is a viable option. iTunes already respects the Hawaiian music market, so looking to pitch through iTunes is a way to get it out now and drive some capital doing it.

With the playing field leveling off like this, particularly when creating programming aimed at the young and the geeky, it is going to be quite interesting watching our local dinosaur affiliates think out of the box to keep relevant.

In due time...

mel

April 23rd, 2007, 09:34 PM

What happens if you go to a concert?

They probably won't let you in. Also how clunky are these set-ups? You have to take a laptop computer, a camera and hope the internet connection works. The other day I watched Ryan's camera take a few spills in his car... and he admitted sand may have gotten onto his MacBook. This stuff is certainly risky for your expensive gear.

Can you walk through an airport like that?

Probably not through security for sure... should not be allowed to use on the plane during the take-off and landing sections of the flight, though I have seen a lot of videos of inside the plane take-offs and landings on YouTube. Aren't all electronic devices supposed to be turned off during this time as they supposedly interfere with navigation and safety?

Would this hurt your security clearance if you had one?

This probably would not be allowed in the Federal Building and other government installations... not to mention many private corporations and workplaces.

pzarquon will you stream yourself watching Lost?

I don't see much problem if a private individual want to show the world how he and his family spends a day at the beach, eating lunch or watching TV. That is harmless entertainment.

I just hope people who are doing this are mindful of other people in the area who may not want to be photographed, much less videotaped and streamed live.

Lifecasting definitely has its applications where you want to share a sunset, a moment, a public event like a parade, or a private event (with permission) such as a seminar or class lecture. Scrivener's intention on broadcasting how something like "remote teaching" certainly has possibilities.

scrivener

April 23rd, 2007, 09:50 PM

I don't see much problem if a private individual want to show the world how he and his family spends a day at the beach, eating lunch or watching TV. That is harmless entertainment.
If the sound or images of the TV show are picked up, it is a rebroadcast, and probably illegal. Businesses who stream live radio through their phone systems ("hold music") are usually guilty of rebroadcasting, too, if they haven't paid someone for a license or gotten some other kind of permission. This didn't prevent Ryan from having the radio turned up in his car!

mel

April 23rd, 2007, 11:01 PM

If the sound or images of the TV show are picked up, it is a rebroadcast, and probably illegal. Businesses who stream live radio through their phone systems ("hold music") are usually guilty of rebroadcasting, too, if they haven't paid someone for a license or gotten some other kind of permission. This didn't prevent Ryan from having the radio turned up in his car!

Yep, probably so as this was discussed a few years ago in the radio forum.

However like YouTube, how many companies are going to enforce this? Surely home videos that either use music outright or have it captured in the background have gotten away (so far) with this. For now I don't see anything that would be horribly different with content on Ustream.

I think the RIAA and MPAA are too busy busting the P2P people before they go after people who place or capture a piece of music on their video.

Is the person streaming in a shopping mall where the background music is captured a criminal? What about the parent recording their kids singing in with a TV show or a music program? Certainly the firm streaming KUMU FM on their phone is guilty...and the little mom and pop store playing music on their radio.

Singing "Happy Birthday to You" and streaming it makes every birthday celebrant a criminal.

Like podcasting, all commercial music content is off limits. What a sad world where commercial music is prevalent just about everywhere and you stand a chance of being a criminal because of the big media companies.

pzarquon

April 23rd, 2007, 11:14 PM

This didn't prevent Ryan from having the radio turned up in his car!I'm very cognizant of these concerns, and am already regretting the playful moments when I did, indeed, tune into KHPR, KIPO, and KINE (as well as a Kauai station?) at random points during these live broadcasts. I was being rebellious, but at least I knew I shouldn't be doing what I was doing. :)

So, just in case I ever want music on another "live drive," I've already made a CD containing music by people from whom I've already secured permission to use (podcasting is different from streaming, true, but I feel comfortable here)... or that at least have more appropriate or Creative Commons licensing.

But as it turns out, music is distracting when you're trying to have a conversation with people. It's hard enough to hear over wind, road, or crowd noise. So the best "background music" for live, mobile video might be none at all, anyway.
They probably won't let you in. Also how clunky are these set-ups?As to the "clunkiness" of these setups... keep in mind, my setup is as klunky as they come. An open laptop, an external camera, a USB modem hanging off the side, wires everywhere... It's ridiculous.

But the more common model adopted by the geeks wandering around on Ustream today is a hat mounted camera (with the laptop closed and tucked neatly away in a backpack), or streaming directly from a mobile handheld device (like a Nokia N95). That's a lot less conspicuous. You could then move into "lipstick camera" or "glasses camera" territory if you wanted to be really sneaky.

Getting this stuff through airport security would be a challenge (although you never know), true, but it's already inconspicuous enough for day-to-day people and places. That's what's exciting... and frightening at the same time.
I just hope people who are doing this are mindful of other people in the area who may not want to be photographed, much less videotaped and streamed live.I plan to be as courteous as possible, and certainly not point the camera anyone who doesn't want to be captured. There's a geek meetup on Thursday where the camera's been invited, but will be set up on an adjacent "opt in" table, for example.

But on the other hand, a public beach, a public street, these are not places you have a "reasonable expectation of privacy." Heck, these are places where private interests, let alone the government, are already observing and recording you. I would probably just not be a jerk and point the camera the other way if you cringe or duck, but not everyone will.

scrivener

April 23rd, 2007, 11:45 PM

However like YouTube, how many companies are going to enforce this?

Is the person streaming in a shopping mall where the background music is captured a criminal? What about the parent recording their kids singing in with a TV show or a music program? Certainly the firm streaming KUMU FM on their phone is guilty...and the little mom and pop store playing music on their radio.

Singing "Happy Birthday to You" and streaming it makes every birthday celebrant a criminal.
You're right about probably getting away with it, but let's forget about the legality of it all and consider the rights of the artist. When someone creates art, he or she should have a reasonable expectation to decide for him- or herself how that art is going to be used. If I write a song, for example, I don't want someone using it to sell something I'm morally opposed to, like men's fashion underwear that doesn't have the little door in front. And that should be my right. I don't want people using it in a way that I don't permit.

Of course there's not a thing wrong (in my opinion), legal or not, with how Ryan probably used whatever he used, but that's got to be up to whoever owns the rights to the music. And THAT is worth trying to live up to, and that's is something I've always respected Ryan for -- whether it's because of a law or because of the belief in artists' rights, at least he leaves it up to the artists.

Oh, and PS: Lest anyone think I'm on some kind of high horse, I should come clean and say that I take liberties with artists' rights myself, quite frequently. I'm not proud of it.

mel

April 24th, 2007, 04:33 AM

As to the "clunkiness" of these setups... keep in mind, my setup is as klunky as they come.

But the more common model adopted by the geeks wandering around on Ustream today is a hat mounted camera (with the laptop closed and tucked neatly away in a backpack), or streaming directly from a mobile handheld device (like a Nokia N95). That's a lot less conspicuous. You could then move into "lipstick camera" or "glasses camera" territory if you wanted to be really sneaky.

Yep, when the gear becomes small and less conspicuous is when there will be plenty of concern with this phenomena. Everything from privacy to national security could be at risk. Criminal activity is surely to follow technological success.

Getting this stuff through airport security would be a challenge (although you never know), true, but it's already inconspicuous enough for day-to-day people and places. That's what's exciting... and frightening at the same time.

I agree.

I plan to be as courteous as possible, and certainly not point the camera anyone who doesn't want to be captured.

But on the other hand, a public beach, a public street, these are not places you have a "reasonable expectation of privacy." Heck, these are places where private interests, let alone the government, are already observing and recording you. I would probably just not be a jerk and point the camera the other way if you cringe or duck, but not everyone will.

Exactly. Some people like you will be courteous, others won't. Being captured in the distant background in a public place is not too bothersome, but being filmed up close, especially when you make an effort to avoid it is troublesome.

So far most government and institutional surveillance are not shared over the internet in real time with the world. Those surveillance videos that do make it out into the public are those few cases where a crime like a bank robbery takes place and you happen to be there at the same time.

All of this stuff has shades of "big brother" moving beyond the commonality of institutions... it now makes the individual "big brother".

But then this is already happening with people who take digital photos and videos and share them on non-streaming sites such as Flickr and YouTube. The streaming sites like Ustream puts this into a new arena.

You're right about probably getting away with it, but let's forget about the legality of it all and consider the rights of the artist.

As for music, yes, you are right about the legality. I am sure the remaining members of the Beatles and their estates cringe every time one of their songs show up in a commercial that they may not like. In their case, they sadly don't own the rights to most of their classic songs.

Still something like filming a parade where a marching band is coming down the street playing "Hawaii Five-0" brings the legal question back to the forefront.

Complicated times we live in when we have to worry about potential litigation when engaged in otherwise normal day to day activities.

pzarquon

April 27th, 2007, 08:09 AM

There was a casual meetup of Web 2.0/startup obsessed geeks in Manoa last night, and of course I set up live streaming video so folks could spy on us. Here's a short clip from the evening (http://www.ustream.tv/hawaii/videos/n2lzz5DSFlq1tjYo2u3EQg) starring our very own Christa.

The rig I'm using is relatively portable, but using a Mac laptop is actually overkill given the limited hardware required and a bit bulky. One of the things we discussed was how easy it would be to slim things down to make a live video stream setup even more portable.

Justin.TV got the early hype, but by the end of the year, there will be a hundred people doing the exact same thing, "lifecasting" live, all the time. And plenty of them will be more charismatic and interesting than Justin, and make for some compelling viewing. Interesting times!

scrivener

April 27th, 2007, 08:25 AM

but will any of them be any more female than Justin? i don't ask this lecherously; i just wonder why so far there has been so little representation of women in this bizarre activity.

pzarquon

April 28th, 2007, 09:40 AM

It's a reasonable question, underlying lechery or not. The "iJustine.tv" experiment on Justin.TV proved a success, in my mind, and tells me it can be done.

Indeed, Justine excelled. She possessed enough charisma to keep viewers entertained and simultaneously energize and light up every room she entered (something Justin does not do), and still caught enough eye candy to draw Justin.TV's usual male-dominated audience. (Some had suspected that a woman in the HatCam would be a big beefcake gawking-fest.) Indeed, sexist or not, Justine with a camera was definitely less intimidating than Justin with a camera insofar as the spontaneous reactions she got from people. It may be personality more than gender, though, that so disarmed those she came in contact with.

But, for the totally immersive, 24/7 model that Justin.TV is championing (versus the more 'event focused' live streaming that will probably be where most folks like me end up) carries risks. And whether you call it being a sexist or a realist, I think it's a lot easier for a man to show off where he lives, every alley he walks down, every coffee shop he goes to than it would be for a woman. At a nightclub, at a block party, at a conference, I'd imagine the social landscape is pretty equal for everyone. But the more personal details of your everyday life? I regret to say I think men have it easy.

In other news...

I've made some upgrades to my setup, and am pretty sure I'm at the brink of Justin.TV's mobile model. Again, I'm not interested in 24/7, but moving around while broadcasting is a compelling idea for me.

Sometime this weekend, I'm definitely going to be biting the bullet and strapping a small camera to my head, and walking around somewhere. Spam Jam? Another lunch in the park? We'll see, as they say. Depends on my wife's tolerance for public geekery and dorkiness, and how well I've tested my hardware!

pzarquon

May 5th, 2007, 11:01 PM

The tinkering continues. I've now created "HawaiiUP Live (http://www.hawaiiup.com/live)," which is basically a web page that's a mashup of various web tools to achieve the epitome of mobile video geekery.

There's the streaming video, a chatbox (but you have to click to trust ol' Philippe), my last Twitter update (one of the main ways to keep tabs on me), a form to send me an SMS message (this one could be a problem eventually) and other ways to contact me, links to video archives, and... the pièce de résistance, a GPS-powered Google map to show location. Eat your heart out, Justin!

I've had a lot of fun with this rig the last few days. I met up with some other geeks in downtown on Friday, crashing the FHB cafeteria then touring Oceanit and Hoana Medical's offices on Fort Street. I've gone for lunch-hour walks on Ala Moana beach. Today we took the kids to the park, then to the shopping center for some shave ice. Basically sharing one dork's island experience in a most unique way.

I'm still struggling with battery life, and learning other limits... from the physical (elevators buried deep in concrete buildings kill the signal) to the sociological. I have no idea where stuff like this is headed in the long term, and I imagine it won't be all fun and games. So, I'm enjoying things in these heady, early days of random experimentation.

Wonder where we'll go tomorrow? :)

christa

May 8th, 2007, 08:26 AM

Man. If there was anyone in Hawaii whose life should be broadcast live over the internet, it's Christa's. I mean... how much fun would all this be (http://honolulund.blogspot.com/) to watch as it happens?

SO nice of you to say that ryan!! you know i would rather be behind to camera where i feel most comfortable tho. i think the idea of being the wear-er would be perfect tho since you are getting everyone/thing else.

just from a few days with justin tho i realize that it's NOT an ideal sitch. a lot of people were kind of rude about being filmed. there were a couple of 'fan' situations that actually freaked me out too.

bottom line? i'm sticking with photos for now :) :)

pzarquon

May 12th, 2007, 12:22 PM

I don't think it's a coincidence that some of the most prolific photographers are also uncomfortable in front of the camera. I think we all figure out that the best way to not be caught in pictures is by being the one taking them! :) Of course, from digital cameras to private surveillance to "lifecasting" like this, we're not too far off from a world where you could walk into a room where everyone is recording, photographing, and broadcasting.

In some environments, cameras are par for the course. In others, they're unexpected. Justin runs in to the full range of reactions, and I'm sure none are really a surprise. Some people are energized and entranced by the camera, others resent it, and a lot of people just don't know what to make of it.

And as you learned, he's making himself a public figure, which comes with a lot of baggage. People will say things to and about him (and people around him, including you!) that they'd never say in a typcal social arrangement. Since you're on screen, they figure you're fair game. It was... surreal lurking in the infamous Justin.TV chatrooms while you were with him.

All this is relatively new, and who knows what will be the "usual" when it comes to lifecasting a year from now. I'm enjoying experimenting early, before lawyers ruin all the fun.

I've made my new obsession official and set up a separate site for it: HawaiiGeek.TV (http://www.hawaiigeek.tv). There's a rambly explanation, some archives, the start of a schedule (Dean Kamen on Tuesday!), and a FAQ that will have some Qs as soon as they're FA'd. :) I'm taking the rig to the Filipino Fiesta this afternoon... we'll see how it holds up.

mel

May 12th, 2007, 03:06 PM

I don't think it's a coincidence that some of the most prolific photographers are also uncomfortable in front of the camera. I think we all figure out that the best way to not be caught in pictures is by being the one taking them! :).

Exactly. The more the potential for way too many cameras to be in one place, the less I am willing to go to an event or meeting, unless through the course of work or something, I have to be there (usually taking photos myself). It is one thing trying to avoid the still photographers and still another to try and avoid the videographers including the TV news people.

Now this "livecasting" or whatever have you is more of a concern, especially as it grows in popularity. It has the potential of turning anyone into a voyeuristic street journalist with no purpose except to broadcast something live. No thanks, but I don't want to be caught in their stream.

In this urban society it is getting harder and harder to stay away from prying cameras and lenses.

I think in time the situation will get to a point where the lawyers and legislators will get "into the picture" and try to litigate or regulate some if not all of it.

LikaNui

June 6th, 2007, 08:53 AM

Congratulations, Ryan, on this major story (http://honoluluadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070606/LIFE/706060351/1076) in today's Advertiser about your "lifecasting". (Good photos of ya, too!)
Too much good stuff to even quote part of it here (including a mention of HawaiiThreads), so you folks need to click on the link.
Ho`omaika`i, Ryan!

:)

tutusue

June 6th, 2007, 09:52 AM

High 5, Ryan!

1stwahine

June 6th, 2007, 09:54 AM

Way to GO Ryan!!:D

Auntie Lynn

LikaNui

June 6th, 2007, 11:21 AM

Shoots, Ryan is getting so much publicity these days that I almost stuck this item in the "Celebrity" section of HT!

:p

lavagal

June 6th, 2007, 11:28 AM

Our favorite tech geek (http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070606/LIFE/706060351/1076)is featured today in The Advertiser! Love it! So, can I take the Island Life section all over the office and say "he's my friend! he's my friend?!!" Can I? Can I?

Now, if only I could figure out my Razr!!!

pzarquon

June 6th, 2007, 02:11 PM

Heh. Thanks, all! I admit, I enjoyed having my geek status affirmed in a newspaper of record! I know the reporter talked to a bunch of other people, but my head was so big there was only room for Burt (Quark) and I. :p

Despite what the photos and captions may have implied, my Treo 700p is not a live video streaming device. The photographer caught me taking a photo with it, and asked for its specs, but I guess I didn't clarify. I do take videos with it (see "Drowsy (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J50-iGMIlbE)" or "Bon Dance (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_Bjkl7APeA)" on YouTube), but can't broadcast live.

Yet.

jdub

June 6th, 2007, 07:30 PM

Ryan, you're the man, dude. Can I get my hand on your footage of the Rakes at the Spam Jam? I'll put it on our myspace page with mad props to you and a link to hawaiigeek.tv!

pzarquon

June 21st, 2007, 04:37 PM

Hey, Jdub! You can get the video out of my HawaiiGeek.TV archives (http://www.hawaiigeek.tv/archives/). But it's really not pass-along material. 'Twas filmed with a tiny camera and an overwhelmed microphone strapped to my shoulder and filming mostly the lower stage and road! :)

Fun as it is to share live, there's nothing quite like being there in person.

And... this just in. The Justin.TV network, which has expanded its network quite a bit in the past few weeks, has apparently opened up a channel right here in Hawaii (http://www.lightfantastic.org/imr/extras/weblog/archives/004872.html). Star 101.9 is involved, and apparently so is KSSK (http://www.ksskradio.com/pages/KSSKCAM.html).

It's not quite lifecasting, insofar as its more a promotional vehicle within an entertainment model for a corporate entity... but it does demonstrate the increasing prevalence of live, streaming video.