Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

North American Union

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • North American Union

    Link to Article
    President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

    Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

    President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.
    What are your thoughts?
    Last edited by admin; May 15, 2007, 05:22 AM. Reason: Respect copyright; don't post full articles.
    flickr

    An email from God:
    To: People of Earth
    From: God
    Date: 9/04/2007
    Subject: stop

    knock it off, all of you

    seriously, what the hell


    --
    God

  • #2
    Re: North American Union

    I'm for globalization and would support an open borders policy. The rest of the world is eventually going to shift in this direction anyway. Technology is the one that is truly breaking down the borders. First the airplane and now the internet.

    I think that is why even China is going capitalism and understands that they cannot filter information from it's citizens for much longer. And the only way for those in power to retain their power is to be the owners of the corporations. Equal rights for all citizens by law will be the norm. But wealth and therefore access to resources like education and healthcare will not.

    GW Bush, for all the bad that he did with Iraq, is pushing the U.S. in the right direction for business. Those with capital ownership support his policies, and those without probably don't. That's why the conflicting stance on immigration and borders. btw, those without captial ownership, I believe make up the majority of the votes. (not sure?) In a democracy, those with the capital are really the minority and have to use their capital to influence the votes. So far the U.S. has shown this system works. And I believe this is a model for other countries to adopt.

    A world with less discrimination based on race, gender, sexual preference, and maybe religion is good right? The laws will make it appear that way even if people don't necessarily practice it

    So the whole world is going with less borders, starting in their particular region. Welcome, to Our Brave New World! I haven't check out his books yet, but I hear they are good, Alvin Toffler.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: North American Union

      I, for one, welcome our new Canado-Mexican overlords.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: North American Union

        Originally posted by Glen Miyashiro View Post
        I, for one, welcome our new Canado-Mexican overlords.

        LMAO!
        flickr

        An email from God:
        To: People of Earth
        From: God
        Date: 9/04/2007
        Subject: stop

        knock it off, all of you

        seriously, what the hell


        --
        God

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: North American Union fiasco$
          Link to Article
          What are your thoughts? "--- TATTRAT;145962


          "What are your thoughts?" Many and similar.
          --"President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed."--

          The U.S. has become nothing less than, and little more than, an economic extension of European colonialism. What would Europe without its parasitic interests throughout the world? What would the U.S. be without Europe? What would the U.S. be without its parasitic (and prostituting induUStrie$ {aka Saudi Arabia, , Iraqui National Congress (or is U.S. elitedom the whore?), Kuwait, ...)

          --"To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity.--"
          --"Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America" Union--
          Last edited by waioli kai; May 13, 2007, 10:33 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            RE: North American Union fiasco$ 'n fascUSm$

            .
            ---Link to Article
            What are your thoughts? "--- TATTRAT;145962---

            -"What are your thoughts?" Many and similar. -
            ---"President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed."--

            The U.S. has become nothing less than, and little more than, an economic extension of European colonialism. What would Europe be without its parasitic interests throughout the world? What would the U.S. be without Europe, the West's parasitic interests throughout the world? What would the U.S. be without its parasitic (and prostituting induUStrie$ {aka Saudi Arabia, , Iraqui National Congress (or is U.S. elitedom the whore?), Kuwait, ..., ...} worldwide/satellite/"intelligence" systems?
            ---"To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity.--"

            For whom? elitUSt$ ??
            ---"Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America" Union--
            ---

            And the Samozas, Batistas, Allendes, Reagan-"Contras", capitalUST$ of "The Americas" will bestow happines$Ts in perpetuity on their own and their attorneys' and financial aides' bloodlines.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: North American Union

              The problem with globalism is that it lets in $$ and products, but keeps out people. It creates an imbalance, and generates poverty and anger.
              http://thissmallfrenchtown.blogspot.com/
              http://thefrenchneighbor.blogspot.com/

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: North American Union

                Interesting that both Democratic Presidential nominee Barack Obama and Republican John McCain refuse to even acknowledge the planned superhighway. I wonder if any journalist will bring up the the SPP, and whether the dialogue that has been conspicuously absent since the suspension of Ron Paul’s campaign will again be subject to debate.

                The American public deserves to know the intentions of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Bilderberg Group, the SPP, the Trilateral Commission and the military-industrial complex.

                A timeline, according to the MSM:

                We can’t be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans.

                — U.S. President Bill Clinton
                USA TODAY, page 2A
                11 March 1993

                Comment

                Working...
                X