Can anyone point me to a copy of the actual report that the arbitration panel wrote, in which they made the arbitration award to HGEA? HGEA's web site at least gives the details of the award, which is more than the Advertiser and the Star-Bulletin do:
But what I'd like to know is, what are the arguments that HGEA and the State made regarding the dispute? And what was the panel's rationale for their decision? It seems like the Advertiser and the Star-Bulletin just do this he-said-she-said reporting, but they never go to the panel's actual report. I wonder why not? It's odd that such an important document isn't on somebody's web site already.
Two arbitration panels have awarded pay raises and step movements to the state's 27,050 employees in Units 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 13 for their 2005-2007 contracts. The award for 25,683 state and county employees in Units 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 13 includes:
* 3.5 percent increases for Units 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 13 on October 1, 2005, and October 1, 2006.
* Step movements for eligible employees of Units 2, 3, 4 and 13 from July 1, 2005, to June 30, 2007.
* Step movements for eligible employees of Units 6 and 8 on January 1, 2006, and January 1, 2007.
* 3.5 percent increases for Units 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 13 on October 1, 2005, and October 1, 2006.
* Step movements for eligible employees of Units 2, 3, 4 and 13 from July 1, 2005, to June 30, 2007.
* Step movements for eligible employees of Units 6 and 8 on January 1, 2006, and January 1, 2007.
Comment