Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Love for us Geeks

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Love for us Geeks

    My friend sent me this and it is pretty much dead on?

    Dear IT Support,
    Last year I upgraded from Boyfriend 5.0 to Husband 1.0
    and noticed a slow down in the overall performance,
    particularly in the flower and jewellery applications
    that had operated flawlessly under Boyfriend 5.0.

    In addition, Husband 1.0 uninstalled many other
    valuable programs, such as Romance 9.5 and Personal
    Attention 6.5, but installed undesirable programs
    such
    as Formula One 5.0, NBA 3.0, Premier League,
    Counter-Strike and World Cup 2.0.

    And now Conversation 8.0 no longer runs and House
    Cleaning 2.6 simply crashes the system. I've tried
    running Nagging 5.3 to fix these problems, but to no
    avail.

    What can I do?

    Signed,
    Desperate

    ================================

    Reply:

    Dear Desperate,

    First keep in mind: Boyfriend 5.0 is an entertainment
    package, while Husband 1.0 is an operating system.
    Try entering the command C:\ I THOUGHT YOU LOVED ME
    and download Tears 6.2 to install Guilt 3.0.

    If all works as designed, Husband 1.0 should then
    automatically run the applications Jewellery 2.0 and
    Flowers 3.5. But remember, over use can cause Husband
    1.0 to default to Grumpy Silence 2.5, Happy Hour 7.0
    or Late Night Out 6.1. And Late Night 6.1 is a very
    bad program that will create SnoringLoudly.wav files.

    Whatever you do, DO NOT install Mother-in- Law 1.0 or
    reinstall another Boyfriend program. These are not
    supported applications and will crash Husband 1.0.

    In summary, Husband 1.0 is a great program, but it
    does have a limited memory and cannot learn new
    applications quickly.

    You might consider additional software to improve
    memory and performance. I personally recommend Hot
    Food 3.0 and Lingerie 6.9.

    Good Luck,

    IT Support

  • #2
    Re: Love for us Geeks

    Thats funny, funny, funny.

    I've heard that Husband 1.0 is a time tested program, and after 30 or so years, it runs flawlessly. I've also heard that if a user does not use Husband 1.0 enough, it tends to get a "roaming eye" bug.
    FutureNewsNetwork.com
    Energy answers are already here.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Love for us Geeks

      Entertaining, yes. But for the most part, there's no need to post verbatim to HawaiiThreads.com the various jokes, urban legends, and other e-mail forwards that have been circulating around the Internet since the dawn of time (or at least AOL). A simple link will suffice, especially as this one has been around so long, there are dozens of variations.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Love for us Geeks

        Then there's the question: Would this have been better if it was all in Open Source?
        How'd I get so white and nerdy?

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Love for us Geeks

          Errr... it is open source. Isn't it?

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Love for us Geeks

            Okay now I'm totally confused here. What do Genomes have to do with open sources?
            Life is what you make of it...so please read the instructions carefully.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Love for us Geeks

              Originally posted by craigwatanabe
              Okay now I'm totally confused here. What do Genomes have to do with open sources?
              No genomes in this forum; that's a typo --- it should read "e-gnomes."

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Love for us Geeks

                You know. Genomes. DNA. Source code. Ah, never mind, it was a weak joke to begin with.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Love for us Geeks

                  Originally posted by Glen Miyashiro

                  You know. Genomes. DNA. Source code. Ah, never mind, it was a weak joke to begin with.
                  No problem. You're already covered in the "Apology" thread.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Love for us Geeks

                    Originally posted by Glen Miyashiro
                    it was a weak joke to begin with.
                    Maybe just a genetic aberration; a defective chromosome, perhaps?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Love for us Geeks

                      I guess I'm just too old for this iPod generation...iSorry

                      iYaiYai
                      Life is what you make of it...so please read the instructions carefully.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Love for us Geeks

                        Originally posted by Glen Miyashiro
                        You know. Genomes. DNA. Source code. Ah, never mind, it was a weak joke to begin with.
                        Oh... Man, jokes aren't funny when you need to explain it.

                        (and if this was a computer joke, why is it here, and not in Circuit Circus?)
                        How'd I get so white and nerdy?

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X