Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Fat versus smoke
Collapse
X
-
Re: Fat versus smoke
Originally posted by Hope View PostHmmm...and we could add a "man" tax, too...after all, most violent crimes, murders, molestations, car jackings, drug dealing, auto thefts, domestic violence, drunk drivers, etc. are committed by men. They fill up the vast majority of prisons, so they should have higher taxes, too.
As for the problem with men, who do you think raised them?
Comment
-
Re: Fat versus smoke
Originally posted by WindwardOahuRN View PostIt might be in the case of kim chee...
I've been working for about a year and a half or so (biking to work and back about half the time, reducing fat and refined sugar, etc) and lost about 20 pounds so far (6', a little under 210lbs now). I've made few dietary sacrifices, t's made me feel so much better and while I've yo-yo'd too, I've gone down more than up. I figure I have another 20-30 to go. I feel bad for people who honestly can't lose it (I know they're out there). It's like a full time hobby to try to properly manage your calories and exercise. Death by abundance...
What killed my solid downward trend was visiting Hawai`i actually... :P So much good food to try.
Comment
-
-
Re: Fat versus smoke
Originally posted by 808shooter View PostHow about a Fat Tax to go along with the Sin Tax that covers cigs?
If you buy unhealthy food, we slap a tax on you that goes towards healthcare coverage.
Yes what a brilliant idea!
Miulang"Americans believe in three freedoms. Freedom of speech; freedom of religion; and the freedom to deny the other two to folks they don`t like.” --Mark Twain
Comment
-
Re: Fat versus smoke
Originally posted by GeckoGeek View PostAh, but what is unhealthy food? Some things seem to flip-flop. First eggs were bad, now they're good. Hard to keep up.
Comment
-
Re: Fat versus smoke
Originally posted by 808shooter View PostI propose creating a new Hawaii State Department of Food Assessment. It will be responsible for measuring how unhealthy a food item is and assess the appropriate tax.
Comment
-
Re: Fat versus smoke
let's go all the way:
-in our public schools, everyone, both student and staff, should weigh in, and get alloted their school lunch according to Weight Watcher guidelines.
-its time to sue the high fructose corn syrup mafia and the enriched flour cartel.
-outlaw meats; too many cows on the planet as it is, wreckin' the environment. Let's make them, piggies, and goats all endangered species by underbreeding the suckers. Plus, the ocean will thank us, by letting the fishes grow back.
-and put tobacco on decriminalization status; no more Philip Morrises of the world. Private citizens are allowed to grow only three tobacco plants at a time, with their medical card...oh wait, my bad, I meant their religious card. Tobacco goes back into its native American sacrament status. So to get that religious card, you have to show on your tax returns that you contribute to the Native American Indian Churches (casinos).
pax
Comment
-
Re: Fat versus smoke
Mark my words. Someday airlines will charge passengers by the pound. Maybe some taxes and insurance premiums could be similarly calculated.“First we fought the preliminary round for the k***s and now we’re gonna fight the main event for the n*****s."
http://hollywoodbitchslap.com/review...=416&printer=1
Comment
-
Re: Fat versus smoke
Originally posted by sinjin View PostMark my words. Someday airlines will charge passengers by the pound. Maybe some taxes and insurance premiums could be similarly calculated.
Miulang"Americans believe in three freedoms. Freedom of speech; freedom of religion; and the freedom to deny the other two to folks they don`t like.” --Mark Twain
Comment
-
Re: Fat versus smoke
Originally posted by sinjin View PostMark my words. Someday airlines will charge passengers by the pound. Maybe some taxes and insurance premiums could be similarly calculated.
I'm not so worried as I hope individual genetic mapping is affordable at the retail level in my lifetime.
http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresource...legislat.shtml
Comment
-
Re: Fat versus smoke
Originally posted by Miulang View PostSWA already refuses to board avoirdupois-ly challenged people unless they want to spring for the price of a second seat. Their reasoning is that other people don't like having people "dripping over" in their seats into their neighbors' personal space.
Comment
-
Re: Fat versus smoke
Obesity / morbid obesity will take 20 yrs of your life on average. Smoking is now 3 or 4 yrs. Cigs are safer now these days ( filters, chemistry changes, ect. ) and people smoke less than 30 years ago.
Better a smoker than a fatty.
Comment
-
Re: Fat versus smoke
Originally posted by 808shooter View Postand you know what? I kinda feel bad for those folks that are totally overweight. They should get a discounted rate to first class because as uncomfortable as it is to sit next to them, it's gotta be worse for them.
As challenging as it is to take care of these people I cannot help but feel compassion for them. Whatever brought them to this point is irrelevant. Morbid obesity often brings terrible loneliness and isolation to its sufferers. I doubt very much that any of them would wish the terrible circumstances of their lives on their worst enemies.
That was a nice bit of compassion on your part, Shooter.
Happy Holidays....
Comment
Comment