Re: The Hillary Rodham Clinton Watch
Uhh, as the blog shows, it was generalized statements about trade agreements (note the inclusion of WTO) made to a small constituency of 100 farmers in Illinois. It was NOT statements designed to support/reject NAFTA, as they were made to that small group in 2004, more than a decade after NAFTA was passed. Heck, Obama wasn't even in elective office when NAFTA was passed.
But the 2 Clintons stumped for NAFTA and supported its passage in congress, when Bill was the prez and Hillary was the first lady. That fact does not and will not ever change.
That blogger is reaching, big time. And I think most voters in Ohio won't buy it, come March 4.
Lots of speculation about Obama's campaign motives and timings. Still doesn't change the fact that Clinton voted to support an authorizaton for President Bush to take military action in Iraq.
As I said before, I base my voting decisions on facts. Not on other people's speculation. And certainly not on bloggers with slick-looking websites but filled with a crude analysis based on statements that have been taken out of context and twisted to fit an agenda.
Originally posted by cynsaligia
View Post
But the 2 Clintons stumped for NAFTA and supported its passage in congress, when Bill was the prez and Hillary was the first lady. That fact does not and will not ever change.
That blogger is reaching, big time. And I think most voters in Ohio won't buy it, come March 4.
Originally posted by cynsaligia
View Post
As I said before, I base my voting decisions on facts. Not on other people's speculation. And certainly not on bloggers with slick-looking websites but filled with a crude analysis based on statements that have been taken out of context and twisted to fit an agenda.
Comment