Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama v. The Birthers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Obama v. The Birthers

    Originally posted by Bobinator View Post
    Here's a present for Matapule and Leo Lakio. Read em and weep!
    Now repent, thou unbeliever!!!
    [ATTACH]1818[/ATTACH]
    Originally posted by Kaonohi View Post
    OBVIOUSLY doctored, and likely completely faked. NO substantial information is included. It could have been copied from Obama's record of birth and written over. There are NO significant identifying characteristics thereon!

    Obama gave us more than this!
    I have to concur with this. Bob, the form you linked to looks like something straight out of Photoshop. You know, the professional version magazine artists use to airbrush the cellulite off Kim Kardashian’s hips?

    I want to call your attention one last time to what should be a definitive end your inquest:

    Born identity

    By June Watanabe
    Copyright © 2010 starbulletin.com. All rights reserved.

    ...Asked for more information about the short-form versus long-form birth documents, Okubo said the Health Department “does not have a short-form or long-form certificate.”

    “The birth certificate form has been modified over the years and decades to conform to national standards and models,” she said.

    Okubo also emphasized the certification form “contains all the information needed by all federal government agencies for transactions requiring a birth certificate.”

    She added that the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized the state’s current certification of live birth “as an official birth certificate meeting all federal and other requirements.”
    So you see, Bob, not just the state and 49-year-old newspapers, but the U.S. Supreme Court has already spoken on this issue. For better or for worse, Obama is the U.S. President. Period. Get over it.

    We can’t be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans.

    — U.S. President Bill Clinton
    USA TODAY, page 2A
    11 March 1993

    Comment


    • Re: Obama v. The Birthers

      Originally posted by Kaonohi View Post
      Frankly I think this justifies the speculation that Bobinator is a Communist spy working for the Taliban and Al-Queda, born in Nigeria to web-scamming parents...
      So he's the one who sent me this...

      Can't think of anything creative this time

      Comment


      • Re: Obama v. The Birthers

        Originally posted by TuNnL View Post
        I have to concur with this. Bob, the form you linked to looks like something straight out of Photoshop. You know, the professional version magazine artists use to airbrush the cellulite off Kim Kardashian’s hips?

        I want to call your attention one last time to what should be a definitive end your inquest:

        Born identity

        By June Watanabe
        Copyright © 2010 starbulletin.com. All rights reserved.



        So you see, Bob, not just the state and 49-year-old newspapers, but the U.S. Supreme Court has already spoken on this issue. For better or for worse, Obama is the U.S. President. Period. Get over it.
        But does the hanging chit really count as a no vote? Yes let's get over it already.
        Life is what you make of it...so please read the instructions carefully.

        Comment


        • Re: Obama v. The Birthers

          Republicans have announced that if they get control of a house of congress they will use subpoena power to investigate everything about President Obama. So rather than working on the economy or health care or ending mr. bush's stupid needless wars, the President will be answering subpoenas. Do you see how this country has its own destruction built into it? It will be just like the Clinton years again, maybe even worse because of the horrible disasters mr. bush & the republican congresses of the 2000's created.

          Comment


          • Re: Obama v. The Birthers

            Originally posted by Kalalau View Post
            It will be just like the Clinton years again, maybe even worse because of the horrible disasters mr. bush & the republican congresses of the 2000's created.
            It all began with Reagan in the 80's, arguably the worst POTUS ever.
            Peace, Love, and Local Grindz

            People who form FIRM opinions with so little knowledge only pretend to be open-minded. They select their facts like food from a buffet. David R. Dow

            Comment


            • Re: Obama v. The Birthers

              Originally posted by TuNnL View Post
              So you see, Bob, not just the state and 49-year-old newspapers, but the U.S. Supreme Court has already spoken on this issue. For better or for worse, Obama is the U.S. President. Period. Get over it.
              The Court said O.J. was innocent too. Get over it and let him date your daughter...

              Comment


              • Re: Obama v. The Birthers

                Originally posted by TuNnL View Post
                I have to concur with this. Bob, the form you linked to looks like something straight out of Photoshop. You know, the professional version magazine artists use to airbrush the cellulite off Kim Kardashian’s hips?
                Please, I don't even know how to run PhotoShop. I can barely comprehend your mindset. But you're right, I didn't use my birth certificate. I went down to the DOH and got a copy of Matapule's.

                Comment


                • Re: Obama v. The Birthers

                  Originally posted by Walkoff Balk View Post
                  How do I know if it's safe to open that file without a vaccine?
                  It's not safe. You may find out the truth that Obama's a weasel. Then your whole world will be turned upside down, just like Oprah's will.

                  Comment


                  • Re: Obama v. The Birthers

                    The Troll see no difference between the president of the United States and OJ Simpson. Good thing he's open-minded.
                    Burl Burlingame
                    "Art is never finished, only abandoned." -- Leonardo Da Vinci
                    honoluluagonizer.com

                    Comment


                    • Re: Obama v. The Birthers

                      Originally posted by TuNnL View Post
                      So you see, Bob, not just the state and 49-year-old newspapers, but the U.S. Supreme Court has already spoken on this issue. For better or for worse, Obama is the U.S. President. Period. Get over it.
                      Originally posted by Bobinator View Post
                      The Court said O.J. was innocent too. Get over it and let him date your daughter...
                      Aside from the absurdity of comparing the President of the United States to O.J. Simpson, your post is pure fiction. There is no case involving Simpson that made it to the U.S. Supreme Court.

                      We can’t be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans.

                      — U.S. President Bill Clinton
                      USA TODAY, page 2A
                      11 March 1993

                      Comment


                      • Re: Obama v. The Birthers

                        Senator Bunning is allowing unemployment insurance for hundreds of thousands to go thru, now. Also many construction and recovery projects. Now he has put a blanket hold on ALL of President Obama's nominees. His issue this time is something about marketing tobacco. The senate needs to be abolished.

                        Comment


                        • Re: Obama v. The Birthers

                          Originally posted by Kalalau View Post
                          Republicans have announced that if they get control of a house of congress they will use subpoena power to investigate everything about President Obama. So rather than working on the economy or health care or ending mr. bush's stupid needless wars, the President will be answering subpoenas. Do you see how this country has its own destruction built into it? It will be just like the Clinton years again, maybe even worse because of the horrible disasters mr. bush & the republican congresses of the 2000's created.
                          It's now Obama's war. He broke his campaign promise to get the troops out within 6 months of his presidency. He's been commissioned by the global elitist to continue the war profiteering. Judge him by what he does, not what he says and by some other puppet's actions. You get drawn in by the Democrats vs. Republicans smoke and mirrors crap and you'll get blindsided, just like the rest of this stupid country who'd rather engage in fighting each other than routing out all these evil crooked politicians in Capitol Hill.

                          "Eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow we die". It's history all over again.

                          Here's a couple of articles to get some of you all riled up and spewing atrocities at ole Bobinator. There's nothing like getting you all pissed off.

                          http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=126911

                          http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/33992.html
                          Last edited by Bobinator; March 8, 2010, 10:05 AM.

                          Comment


                          • Re: Obama v. The Birthers

                            That decodes as, "leave the biggest disaster behind that you possibly can, for your own political advantage, so that your successor will be blamed for it". Hardly a formula for good government or a stable economy. Right up there with "harrass your airplane pilot while he's trying to get you through turbulent air" as Republican strategy. The good of the country means nothing at all, all that matters is winning so you can give even more money to the wealthiest. Sell the lifeboats to the highest bidder.

                            Comment


                            • Re: Obama v. The Birthers

                              Here's another example of how destructive putting politics above the good of the country is. Justice Rhenquist. Turns out Nixon knew Rhenquist was addicted to pain killers and wanted him on the supreme ct because he knew Rhenquist was drug addled and thought he would be easy to dominate. Do you think, in their wildest nightmares, the founding fathers ever imagined that weak drug addled puppets would be nominated to the highest court in the land? What idealists they must have been, to think presidents would only be nominating well qualified legal minds. Now of course we have the roberts court giving corporations the right to buy future elections. Is there a way out of this? I sure can't see any.

                              Comment


                              • Re: Obama v. The Birthers

                                Originally posted by Kalalau View Post
                                Here's another example of how destructive putting politics above the good of the country is. Justice Rhenquist. Turns out Nixon knew Rhenquist was addicted to pain killers and wanted him on the supreme ct because he knew Rhenquist was drug addled and thought he would be easy to dominate. Do you think, in their wildest nightmares, the founding fathers ever imagined that weak drug addled puppets would be nominated to the highest court in the land? What idealists they must have been, to think presidents would only be nominating well qualified legal minds. Now of course we have the roberts court giving corporations the right to buy future elections. Is there a way out of this? I sure can't see any.
                                We can annex US to China.
                                Beijing 8-08-08 to 8-24-08

                                Tiananmen Square 4-15-89 to 6-04-89

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X