Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 81

Thread: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kahalu`u Stream
    Posts
    2,932

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network

    YUP!

    But is this different from any OTHER news netwrack?

    Where can I get straight, complete, honest NEWS!???????????








    that's what I thought!
    Be Yourself. Everyone Else Is Taken!
    ~ ~
    Kaʻonohiʻulaʻokahōkūmiomioʻehiku
    Spreading the virus of ALOHA.
    Oh Chu. If only you could have seen what I've seen, with your eyes.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Wherever I am, I'm there
    Posts
    3,106

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaonohi View Post
    But is this different from any OTHER news netwrack?
    Yes.

    If you have examples of other networks using video footage that IS NOT of the event reported, please post them.
    Peace, Love, and Local Grindz

    People who form FIRM opinions with so little knowledge only pretend to be open-minded. They select their facts like food from a buffet. David R. Dow

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kahalu`u Stream
    Posts
    2,932

    Default FOXES are VIXENS as well....

    Quote Originally Posted by matapule View Post
    Yes.

    If you have examples of other networks using video footage that IS NOT of the event reported, please post them.
    No, I just assumed that all news (on TV or in publication) was biased based on the source.

    It is interesting that some of my comment sources (such as the NRA - yes I subscribe) consider (and warn us that) FOX is the voice of liberalism!

    I don't consider myself liberal or conservative, more that I judge a situation on its merits, and I don't watch much TV news (because other than local reporting I have not much use for it).

    When a "situation" is in hand then I usually tune in CNN, for 'up to date' news.
    But I must confess that I am unaware of 'lib -conserv' bias in newsreporting by station. Enlighten me, please!

    K
    Be Yourself. Everyone Else Is Taken!
    ~ ~
    Kaʻonohiʻulaʻokahōkūmiomioʻehiku
    Spreading the virus of ALOHA.
    Oh Chu. If only you could have seen what I've seen, with your eyes.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Wherever I am, I'm there
    Posts
    3,106

    Default Re: FOXES are VIXENS as well....

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaonohi View Post
    No, I just assumed that all news (on TV or in publication) was biased based on the source.
    Matapule doesn't necessarily agree with that 'broad brush" assumption. That's like saying that you assume all professional athletes use steroids just because they are world record holders.

    NRA - yes I subscribe) consider (and warn us that) FOX is the voice of liberalism!
    Some consider the NRA a liberal organization, but that doesn't necessarily make it true, it just makes them look.......out of touch.

    Enlighten me, please!
    That's what matapule is trying to do......point out when an organization involved in distributing the news as "fair and balanced" deliberately falsifies that news to suit some agenda, but you have to want to be enlightened first. Fox does it consistently, that's why matapule call's it Faux "News."

    If you have examples of other organizations deliberately falsifying the news, let us know, kataki fakamolemole (pretty please).

    Matapule gets a lot of his local and national news off HT......"News you can Trust!" ya betcha, (wink, wink).
    Peace, Love, and Local Grindz

    People who form FIRM opinions with so little knowledge only pretend to be open-minded. They select their facts like food from a buffet. David R. Dow

  5. #55

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network

    Quote Originally Posted by matapule View Post
    If you have examples of other networks using video footage that IS NOT of the event reported, please post them.
    What about using fake/photoshopped pictures of a public figure, without identifying them as such?

    Hellooooo, MSNBC.

    Yeah, I know. Those fake pics of Caribou Barbie have been around for over a year. And the Letterman-esque Top 10 was clearly an attempt at finding some humor over the resurgence of Palin-mania, coming on the heels of her new book. But was it wise for MSNBC to throw in those two photoshopped pictures of the former Alaskan governor without identifying them as such after some of MSNBC's own (like oh, Keith Olbermann) earlier raked FOX News over the coals for misrepresenting file footage?

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kahalu`u Stream
    Posts
    2,932

    Default Not all FOXES are foxy?

    Quote Originally Posted by matapule View Post
    Matapule doesn't necessarily agree with that 'broad brush" assumption. That's like saying that you assume all professional athletes use steroids just because they are world record holders.
    That's what matapule is trying to do......point out when an organization involved in distributing the news as "fair and balanced" deliberately falsifies that news to suit some agenda, but you have to want to be enlightened first.
    Oh, I do, and I thank you.

    Actually with me it's more a mixture of deep-seated distrust of power (paranoia? - that's the word they use to disempower), experience with news organizations, and knowledge of human nature and the power of money.

    You have however enlightened me to, at least, a matter of degrees among news agencies: some may be worse, some better. But I still trust none of them (though I do sometimes blindly pass their propaganda along).

    K.
    Last edited by Kaonohi; November 25th, 2009 at 12:28 PM. Reason: Fee, fie, faux, frum
    Be Yourself. Everyone Else Is Taken!
    ~ ~
    Kaʻonohiʻulaʻokahōkūmiomioʻehiku
    Spreading the virus of ALOHA.
    Oh Chu. If only you could have seen what I've seen, with your eyes.

  7. #57

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network

    http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/...162809206.html

    Did they use a fact checker to get Bababoweed?

  8. #58

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network


  9. #59

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network

    http://tv.msn.com/tv/article.aspx?ne...cid=rr-tv-news

    Who's going to talk stink about the Clintons now?

  10. #60

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network

    http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/e...-politics.html

    A stretcher match! A stretcher match! No one leaves the squared circle unless it's on a stretcher.

  11. #61
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kahalu`u Stream
    Posts
    2,932

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network

    And, where did I get the idea that they were the FAUX news network??????

    Matapule? Or someone else?
    Be Yourself. Everyone Else Is Taken!
    ~ ~
    Kaʻonohiʻulaʻokahōkūmiomioʻehiku
    Spreading the virus of ALOHA.
    Oh Chu. If only you could have seen what I've seen, with your eyes.

  12. #62

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network

    Hannity knows he's a just whiney shill on his best day, and after the 2nd Obama smackdown of the conjobs he now knows he and his fellow lying sacks are completely irrelevant, he couldn't even muster up a fight against Ellison who was factual but pretty weak in his assaults. I would kill myself if I were Sean Hannity.

  13. #63

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network

    Those gentlemen are in the grip of of a Faustian pair
    of claws.

    Know the truth ,that's one thing.

    Publish it and the main stream media will cut your balls off.
    Sorry, that's just how it is.

  14. #64

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network

    I think America's descent into hateful antagonistic politics and the failed congress dates from Fox and the talk radio industry pitching soooo much BS and personal hatred. Funny a single industry, actually just a handful of rich owners, would get so much power, the power to sink the country just to boost their own ratings & profits.

  15. #65

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network

    There was a quantum shift when some regulations re the airwaves/speech were removed years back, I can't recall the name of it right now but that's where the jump in negatives started, they couldn't get away with it before that.

  16. #66

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network

    http://now.msn.com/tea-party-boycott...ng-too-liberal

    I thought that Fox News and the Tea Party belong to the same gangbang.

  17. #67
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Waimanalo
    Posts
    771

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network

    Quote Originally Posted by Walkoff Balk View Post
    I thought that Fox News and the Tea Party belong to the same gangbang.
    Pew recently issued a report on how much "news" was actually editorial comment, and of the big 3, Fox, CNN, MSNBC, Fox did surprisingly well:
    A separate analysis of cable in late 2012 finds that, over all, commentary and opinion are far more prevalent on the air (63% of the airtime) than straight news reporting (37%). CNN is the only channel to offer more reporting (54%) than opinion (46%), though by a small margin. By far the highest percentage of opinion and commentary is on MSNBC (85% to 15% reporting). Fox was in between at 55% commentary and 45% reporting.
    http://stateofthemedia.org/2013/over.../key-findings/
    Last edited by GregLee; March 25th, 2013 at 08:17 AM.
    Greg

  18. #68
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Wherever I am, I'm there
    Posts
    3,106

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network

    Quote Originally Posted by GregLee View Post
    Pew recently issued a report on how much "news" was actually editorial comment, and of the big 3, Fox, CNN, MSNBC, Fox did surprisingly well:
    MSNBC doesn't promote themselves as being "fair and balanced." Faux Gnus "news" is always slanted to a particular view. Their "gnus" is in fact is all "editorial comment" and frequently incorrect. The Pew survey is slanted and therefore is not "news."

    Rachel Maddow gives the best in-depth analysis of political issues on television.
    Peace, Love, and Local Grindz

    People who form FIRM opinions with so little knowledge only pretend to be open-minded. They select their facts like food from a buffet. David R. Dow

  19. #69

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network


  20. #70

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network

    http://news.yahoo.com/conservatives-...114600971.html

    Glenn Beck and now Sean Hannity. Are fans of Fox News that fickle?

  21. #71

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network

    Quote Originally Posted by Walkoff Balk View Post
    Glenn Beck and now Sean Hannity. Are fans of Fox News that fickle?
    As long as someone is lying to them, deviding the country, and stoking their hate machine, they won't care who it is.

  22. #72

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network

    http://thinkprogress.org/media/2014/...st-statements/

    This is not the National Football League.

  23. #73

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network


  24. #74

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network

    http://www.inquisitr.com/1709098/sean-hannity-worst/

    The worst usually means the most popular.

  25. #75

    Default Re: It should be called the FOX Editorial Network not the FOX News Network


Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •