Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 165

Thread: The 2010 Elections

  1. #1

    Default The 2010 Elections

    Frankly I am full of fear about the coming election. As a Democrat I am aware that the in-power party almost always loses seats in the first election after a Presidential election, but this one is especially scary for a couple of reasons. One, the Republican Party has done a mighty fine job of purging itself of reasonable reach-across-the-aisle moderates and is down to a core of...well...right wing nut cases, like the Birthers, like the Tea Party people (funded by right wing lunatic Koch) who liken President Obama to Adolf Hitler for his attempt to solve the country's disasterous health care system. So odds are, whoever the Republicans nominate for various offices are going to be nut cases who appeal to the nut case base. Delusion is no way to run a government, its a formula for disaster. Two, the public (quite reasonably) does not like gridlock in Congress. Yet very obviously, without question, that is the Republicans' policy: say NO to everything, block everything. More of that is what a Republican vote means. It reminds me of the 1968 election when the public had finally seen thru the BS of the Vietnam War and wanted peace but voted for Nixon because Republicans succeeded in demonizing the peace side as pro commie long hair dope smoking welfare hippies. It worked, but the country got thousands more pointless, completely avoidable deaths. It is Republican policies of deregulating Wall Street that brought the economy to the brink of collapse. Yet thats what the public will be voting for this November, if polls are correct. Just the oil well blowout in the Gulf pretty much proves that environmentalists were not crazy, after all; it was the Drill Baby Drill crowd that was nuts, but thats who the public will seemingly be giving even more power to. And what if nut cases actually do insist on starting a war with Iran? Sorry for starting your day off so gloomily. Happy happy joy joy.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Wherever I am, I'm there
    Posts
    3,198

    Default Re: The 2010 Elections

    K, I could take issue with some of your details, but that is beside the point. The fact is that "conservative" extremists have the spotlight right now and their message apparently resonates with a significant number of people. That's what a democracy is all about......warts and all. It is a reflection of the sentiment of a significant number of people in America. Only time will tell what happens in the 2010 elections, but whatever happens, each one of us has to decide how comfortable they are living in that environment - liberal or consevative or in between.

    I moved to Mexico 4 years ago. The only state I would feel comfortable living in is Hawai'i.
    Peace, Love, and Local Grindz

    People who form FIRM opinions with so little knowledge only pretend to be open-minded. They select their facts like food from a buffet. David R. Dow

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Mō‘ili‘ili
    Posts
    2,456

    Lightbulb Re: The 2010 Elections

    Quote Originally Posted by Kalalau View Post
    the Republican Party has done a mighty fine job of purging itself of reasonable reach-across-the-aisle moderates and is down to a core of...well...right wing nut cases, like the Birthers, like the Tea Party people (funded by right wing lunatic Koch) who liken President Obama to Adolf Hitler for his attempt to solve the country's disasterous health care system... And what if nut cases actually do insist on starting a war with Iran?
    First of all, to characterize the Tea Party people as nutcases is to completely disrespect what makes it such a popular movement in the first place. Maybe one of their financiers is a lunatic in your mind, but he is but one tiny voice in a massive tidal wave of American taxpayers nationwide who are simply fed up with the tax-and-spend liberals running our government today. Literally hundreds of thousands of people make up this movement, and by the next Presidential election, they will number in the millions.

    Your oversimplified characterization of Koch’s objection to “President Obama’s attempt to revamp our health care system” clearly demonstrates you failed to even read the bill. The bill doesn’t create a single-payer system, and instead forces everyone to buy health insurance. At the same time, it showers insurance companies with money and tax breaks in order to finance the burden of covering all these new clients. Even worse, hundreds of million$$$ in the bill are appropriated for pet projects (a.k.a. BRIBES) to get senators and congressmen (who otherwise opposed the legislation) to vote for the bill. But the most damaging part of this bill, is the chilling effect it will have on government control over our lives.

    So before you write off those of us who are concerned about the skyrocketing national debt and deficit — the same kind that has brought Greece to its knees, only on a much more massive scale — as nutcases, please realize that we are now the majority, and that instead of dismissing us, perhaps you should try to justify why the U.S.A. is better off because of the policies of Obama, his administration, and the Democratically-controlled U.S. Senate and Congress. Guantanamo Bay is still open, hundreds of thousands of soldiers are still in Iraq and Afghanistan, and one of the main thugs involved in creating our global financial crisis is now Secretary of the Treasury. What else could possibly go wrong?

    We can’t be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans.

    — U.S. President Bill Clinton
    USA TODAY, page 2A
    11 March 1993

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Wherever I am, I'm there
    Posts
    3,198

    Default Re: The 2010 Elections

    Quote Originally Posted by TuNnL View Post
    a massive tidal wave of American taxpayers nationwide who are simply fed up with the tax-and-spend liberals running our government today.
    Now wait just a guldurn minute! Let's be "fair and balanced!" Taxes are down under Obama compared to W for 97% of taxpayers. 47% of taxpayers pay no Federal Income Tax. The majority of Federal taxes go to the big three, - military, SocSec, and Medicare. Which of those programs would you have the President cut? Ever since Reagan, the Republicans have been the party of "spend and put it on the national credit card." Ever since 1982 our national debt has gone up, with the exception of the Clinton years when the budget was balanced and the national debt went down. I expect and will accept nothing less from Obama but he has 2 1/2 years left to pull it off.
    Peace, Love, and Local Grindz

    People who form FIRM opinions with so little knowledge only pretend to be open-minded. They select their facts like food from a buffet. David R. Dow

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Kapalama Heights.
    Posts
    5,198

    Default Re: The 2010 Elections

    It concerns me that you are "full of fear" about these elections. Fear is the weapon of choice in so much of the dirty rhetoric that fuels propaganda, and the media eats it up like crazy because it gets people's attention. Don't be afraid. The system is largely designed (as Matapule so succinctly puts it) to withstand the extremes. Without extremes, the middle forgets where it is (says this lonely libertarian). With them, most level-headed voters get a better idea of where they stand in relation to others.

    There are checks and balances for a reason. Even if there is a dramatic loss of seats in the Congress for the Democrats, I'd say there's just about no way the Dems lose the Senate. If somehow the Republicans take the House, then we actually have a Capitol Hill that works (sorta) how it was designed. I will agree that the current Republican leadership seems more interested in stonewalling the President than in legislating according to the people's interests, but I have to believe that this will not work in the long run, even if it works in the short-term.

    Tunnl, as usual, presents a reasonable, intelligent way of looking at the conservative base. To dismiss those in another party as nut-jobs is about as constructive as some of the fear-mongering and stone-walling you decry. Rather than be afraid, I think it's much more useful to try to understand what it is about the Tea Partiers that that appeals to regular voters like you and me.
    But I'm disturbed! I'm depressed! I'm inadequate! I GOT IT ALL! (George Costanza)
    GrouchyTeacher.com

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Returned to Molokai
    Posts
    3,419

    Default Re: The 2010 Elections

    Well, we could always kill the Republicans and make a one-party government system. I'm sure China would appeal to that as we merge into one superpower (China-America).
    Beijing 8-08-08 to 8-24-08

    Tiananmen Square 4-15-89 to 6-04-89

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kahalu`u Stream
    Posts
    2,933

    Question Re: The 2010 Elections

    As I have always said:
    The two-party system is a disaster looking for something (someones {us}) to destroy.
    Having 'two sides' to an issue inevitably results in conflict.

    We really need more people to get off their comfortable party pillows and start supporting popular issues. The only reason we don't have a third party is that the contenders won't agree to consolidate. Libertarians (the largest third party contender) could join (with some concessions) to the greens and perhaps some others to make a formidable third party.

    Then instead of conflict we can have chaos!

    And out of chaos will come order.
    All our lives we have known nothing but the Republicrats vs. the Demoncans (unless you are VERY old!). The first hundred years of our country knew many more parties, and at times more than two at a time.

    The two current major parties split out of the Democratic-Republican Party (1792–c.1824), so even they are only two sides of one viewpoint. We are actually functioning with two end pieces of one party.

    Check out all the political parties we have had! Pay particular attention to how many historical parties have been in power.

    At one time we actually had real choices.

    K\/
    Be Yourself. Everyone Else Is Taken!
    ~ ~
    Kaʻonohiʻulaʻokahōkūmiomioʻehiku
    Spreading the virus of ALOHA.
    Oh Chu. If only you could have seen what I've seen, with your eyes.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Wherever I am, I'm there
    Posts
    3,198

    Default Re: The 2010 Elections

    Quote Originally Posted by Random View Post
    Well, we could always kill the Republicans
    Why? They are doing a pretty good job of that themselves!

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaonohi View Post
    The only reason we don't have a third party is that the contenders won't agree to consolidate. ........And out of chaos will come order.
    You mean like what just happened in Great Britain?
    Peace, Love, and Local Grindz

    People who form FIRM opinions with so little knowledge only pretend to be open-minded. They select their facts like food from a buffet. David R. Dow

  9. #9

    Default Re: The 2010 Elections

    Randi Rhodes had an interesting take on the Republican Party purging its own moderate wing--she said nominating Tea Party nut cases would actually be good for Democrats because they--the nut cases--would be so extreme they would be unelectable.

    I was a Republican as a kid, from a family of moderate Republicans. There is no way I could ever picture Dwight Eisenhower or Everett Dirksen or any other of thousands of Republicans name calling, calling President Obama another Hitler, or blocking every piece of legislation, every nomination, regardless of the effect on the country. How did the Republican Party ever go insane? More to the point, why? Was it the nonsense on talk radio?
    And why even tolerate incompetent boobs like GWB and Sarah Palin--idiots you wouldn't trust to administer your retirement funds.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Mō‘ili‘ili
    Posts
    2,456

    Lightbulb Re: The 2010 Elections

    Quote Originally Posted by matapule View Post
    The majority of Federal taxes go to the big three, - military, SocSec, and Medicare. Which of those programs would you have the President cut?
    Both Iraq and Afghanistan are needless wars that should end immediately. Obama has waffled once on the date we withdraw from Iraq once. We’ll see if come August, he does it again.

    Quote Originally Posted by matapule View Post
    Ever since 1982 our national debt has gone up, with the exception of the Clinton years when the budget was balanced and the national debt went down. I expect and will accept nothing less from Obama but he has 2 1/2 years left to pull it off.
    So President Clinton did a good thing, but if you have been following 808shooter’s thread then you know that Bill Clinton’s move was obviously canceled out by his own repeal of the Glass-Steagal Act.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kalalau View Post
    Randi Rhodes had an interesting take on the Republican Party purging its own moderate wing--she said nominating Tea Party nut cases would actually be good for Democrats because they--the nut cases--would be so extreme they would be unelectable.
    Again, this is the type of name-calling scare-tactics that idiots like Rhodes use in a desperate attempt to influence public opinion. You still haven’t explained what makes the Tea Party movement as a whole “nutty.” It’s probably the sanest thing to happen to American politics in decades. It means Americans are finally holding their government accountable for irresponsible financial policy.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kalalau View Post
    I was a Republican as a kid, from a family of moderate Republicans. There is no way I could ever picture Dwight Eisenhower or Everett Dirksen or any other of thousands of Republicans name calling ... why even tolerate incompetent boobs like GWB and Sarah Palin
    Dwight Eisenhower was one of the smartest guys around, but even he pissed off the neocons (that’s the Bilderburg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Trilateral Commission for the uninitiated). He’s one in a long line of presidents who warned the American people that the banking cartel’s primary customer — the military industrial complex — was taking over the country.

    George Dubya Bush on the other hand, is who most ignorant Americans considered “moderate.” At least, Dubya did a brilliant job marketing to the American public that he was a moderate (thanks to Karl Rove). But just like his dad, GWB was a two-bit neocon. What about Barack Obama, who painted himself as a moderate Democrat? Matapule isn’t ready to brand Obama as a neocon yet, but I am. Obama’s entire administration is made up of neocons (Larry Summers, Timothy Geitner, Zbigniew Brzezinski, etc.). Regardless, if GWB is what 21st century has to sell us as moderates, I’ll take extreme conservative/ libertarian (Ron Paul), thank you. At least I know where he stands when it really counts.

    We can’t be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans.

    — U.S. President Bill Clinton
    USA TODAY, page 2A
    11 March 1993

  11. #11

    Default Re: The 2010 Elections

    It is totally reasonable to want the government to act in a financially responsible manner. Yet to even bring that up while mr. bush was starting his Iraq War while simultaneously cutting taxes for the wealthiest among us was denounced as coddling terrorists; one might as well have been funding Al Qaeda as to have questioned the war or its financing on credit. Wall Street was seriously deregulated. Dick Armey slipped an amendment into a last minute funding bill that actually made it impossible for regulators to even look at the books of Wall Street traders, and then when the economy collapsed because of Wall Street recklessness he called Americans who had lost their jobs and or their life savings because of it "whiners". That is the kind of elitist arrogance that brings down empires. Make no mistake, getting out of the economic disaster that mr. bush and Republicans created was always going to be expensive. The time to complain would have been when mr. bush and Mr. Armey created the problem, not when President Obama was trying to fix it.

  12. #12

    Default Re: The 2010 Elections

    Quote Originally Posted by Kalalau View Post
    Randi Rhodes had an interesting take on the Republican Party purging its own moderate wing--she said nominating Tea Party nut cases would actually be good for Democrats because they--the nut cases--would be so extreme they would be unelectable.
    Rhodes is right. During an election year where the political climate should be favoring the GOP, it's the extremists in the party (Tea Baggers, Birthers, and what have you) who are their own worst enemies.

    The way for a party to win major elections is to have candidates with "big tent" appeal. But getting in the way of that goal are the extremists, who are so determined to bounce out anyone in the GOP who doesn't toe the line. These are the folks who have been derided as being RINOs (Republican In Name Only), even if they have the appeal and the charisma to be embraced by the mainstream.

    Some cases in point to show how exclusionary the right-wingers have become:

    1) Florida Governor Charlie Crist - Once thought to possibly be a running mate for John McCain in '08. He later fell out of favor with many in the party after supporting Obama's stimulus plan. His support within the GOP base had dropped so low that he decided to run for the US Senate this year as an independent.

    2) Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown - Less than a week after his historic election, many in the Tea Party became disenchanted with Brown when he joined four other GOP senators in blocking a filibuster that would have derailed Obama's jobs bill.

    3) Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin (???) - Yep, even Ms. You-Betcha has been derided by some in the Tea Party for endorsing Carly Fiorina to be the GOP challenger to California Senator Barbara Boxer. Apparently, the former CEO for H-P isn't conservative enough and the Tea Baggers continue their staunch backing of Chuck DeVore, even though this guy is currently polling a weak third among GOP hopefuls. Even should DeVore pull off a monumental upset in the primary, he wouldn't stand a chance at beating Boxer in the general election.

    Say what you want about the right-wing extremists. They make a lot of noise over the talk-radio airwaves and on FOX news. But major elections aren't won with the party base alone. You've got to win over and connect with the mainstream. And the likes of the Birthers and Tea Baggers have a long way to go in accomplishing that feat.
    Last edited by Frankie's Market; May 11th, 2010 at 09:27 PM.
    This post may contain an opinion that may conflict with your opinion. Do not take it personal. Polite discussion of difference of opinion is welcome.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Mō‘ili‘ili
    Posts
    2,456

    Lightbulb Re: The 2010 Elections

    Quote Originally Posted by Frankie's Market View Post
    Rhodes is right. During an election year where the political climate should be favoring the GOP, it's the extremists in the party (Tea Baggers, Birthers, and what have you) who are their own worst enemies.
    Uhhhh...no. Your own post conflicts with this conclusion:

    Quote Originally Posted by Frankie's Market View Post
    1) Florida Governor Charlie Crist - Once thought to possibly be a running mate for John McCain in '08. He later fell out of favor with many in the party after supporting Obama's stimulus plan. His support within the GOP base had dropped so low that he decided to run for the US Senate this year as an independent.
    This is an example of how the group you call “extremist” have succeeded wildly! Crist is further proof that “mainstream” is no longer a term that describes the majority, and is basically a relic of Frankie and “mainstream” media. GOP base = tea party. Crist will be lucky to squeeze out a half-percentage win over Marco Rubio — you guessed it — a tea party activist, currently leading in the polls.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frankie's Market View Post
    2) Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown - Less than a week after his historic election, many in the Tea Party became disenchanted with Brown.
    Haha! So what? The point is Brown got in as a result of tea party support, and the group now wields a powerful and dominant influence over national politics. Did you not read your own article?

    the likes of the Birthers and Tea Baggers have a long way to go in accomplishing that feat.
    Again, like Kalalau in a desperate attempt to connect two separate and unrelated movements in order to unfairly and inaccurately lump them into a “fringe group,” you put forth a completely unsupported statement. Scott Brown is tea party success #1, Charles Djou will be #2, and Marco Rubio will be #3. And let’s not forget the Utah race. Now if we can just get them all to switch parties to “Libertarian” (which basically embodies many if not most Tea Party values) we just might begin to reclaim D.C.

    I know you’re a bleeding heart-liberal, Frankie, but please. Try to leave the name-calling (yes I am offended at the obscene “tea-bagger” reference) and come to the table with more than just hollow accusations.

    We can’t be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans.

    — U.S. President Bill Clinton
    USA TODAY, page 2A
    11 March 1993

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Returned to Molokai
    Posts
    3,419

    Default Re: The 2010 Elections

    Quote Originally Posted by matapule View Post
    Why? They are doing a pretty good job of that themselves!
    I'm not talking about character assassination, I mean put them down.
    Beijing 8-08-08 to 8-24-08

    Tiananmen Square 4-15-89 to 6-04-89

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Returned to Molokai
    Posts
    3,419

    Default Re: The 2010 Elections

    Quote Originally Posted by TuNnL View Post
    Both Iraq and Afghanistan are needless wars that should end immediately. Obama has waffled once on the date we withdraw from Iraq once. We’ll see if come August, he does it again.
    And yet there are some testimonies that our involvement is a good thing.

    So this whole "we can make a difference in the world" is just pure BS, whether some are in it for ulterior motive.

    We pull out, they go back to square one until one tyrant's party win.

    I mean, we couldn't solve our own gang problem plaguing public housing projects, and yet we send civilian humanitarian workers to Africa now plagued by different religious zealot warlords warring each other yet rich enough to bring the poor people to their sides, the same poor people who returned the favor by becoming soldiers or suicide bombers themselves.

    I VOTE FOR TOTAL ISOLATIONISM AND STOP FIXING THE WORLD!!!!!
    Last edited by Random; May 12th, 2010 at 01:20 AM.
    Beijing 8-08-08 to 8-24-08

    Tiananmen Square 4-15-89 to 6-04-89

  16. #16

    Default Re: The 2010 Elections

    Quote Originally Posted by TuNnL View Post
    Haha! So what? The point is Brown got in as a result of tea party support, and the group now wields a powerful and dominant influence over national politics. Did you not read your own article?
    You question whether I read James Oliphant's article,... yet, your comments are totally oblivious to Oliphant's point that members of the Tea Party consider Scott Brown to be a traitor and a sellout after he crossed party lines to support Obama's $17.6 billion dollar Jobs bill.

    That Brown got elected to the Senate through the help of the Tea Party is quite apparent. But the question now is,.... will he be the type of Senator that conforms to the expectations of the Tea Party? What value is there in throwing one's support behind a winning candidate, when that person gets into office and starts voting in a manner that goes contrary to the promises and pledges that were made during the campaign?

    Quote Originally Posted by TuNnL View Post
    I know you’re a bleeding heart-liberal, Frankie, but please. Try to leave the name-calling (yes I am offended at the obscene “tea-bagger” reference) and come to the table with more than just hollow accusations.
    Tunnl, you need to get yourself more familiar with this thing called the New Oxford American Dictionary. Take some time to read it. You'll find that it defines "teabagger" as:

    a person who protests President Obama's tax policies and stimulus package, often through local demonstrations known as "Tea Party" protests (in allusion to the Boston Tea Party of 1773
    http://www.prnewswire.com/news-relea...-70201607.html

    So by definition, this guy is a teabagger:



    And so is this guy:



    Now Tunnl. If your sensibilities are offended over a provocative slang meaning of the term, then tsk tsk! Shame on you for having your mind in the gutter.
    Last edited by Frankie's Market; May 12th, 2010 at 02:40 AM.
    This post may contain an opinion that may conflict with your opinion. Do not take it personal. Polite discussion of difference of opinion is welcome.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Wherever I am, I'm there
    Posts
    3,198

    Default Re: The 2010 Elections

    Quote Originally Posted by TuNnL View Post
    Both Iraq and Afghanistan are needless wars that should end immediately. Obama has waffled once on the date we withdraw from Iraq once. We’ll see if come August, he does it again.
    I agree. I have criticized him on this Forum for his policy in the Middle East. But we are light years away from what we had before.

    So President Clinton did a good thing, but if you have been following 808shooter’s thread then you know that Bill Clinton’s move was obviously canceled out by his own repeal of the Glass-Steagal Act.
    I don't agree with the premise of that contention. There is always plenty of blame to spread around if you dig deep enough. Every President has been culpable to some extent for bad decisions. What we have to look at is the broad implications of their administration. Given that criteria, Clinton did more for the financial well being of the Nation than any President between Reagan and W.

    It means Americans are finally holding their government accountable for irresponsible financial policy.
    Why didn't it start with Reagan? or W? Why not, because the Tea Party is not a populist movement. It is a splinter party of arch conservatives whose agenda is discrediting a Democrat President and a half black one at that.

    The Tea Party is scary to me because it is infiltrated and in some cases operated by sympathizers to the KKK, White Supremacists, Neo Nutzis, fundamentalist Christians whose agenda is 180 degrees opposite to mine. I have very close relatives who are active members of the Tea Party movement and they have shut me out of their lives because I won't subscribe 100% to their agenda. To them it is all are nothing. What a shame.

    What about Barack Obama, who painted himself as a moderate Democrat? Matapule isn’t ready to brand Obama as a neocon yet, but I am.
    No, I am not ready to judge the direction of Obama's administration until later in his term. It is simply too early to judge.

    I’ll take extreme conservative/ libertarian (Ron Paul), thank you. At least I know where he stands when it really counts.
    You can have him, thank you. Ron Paul is right.....extremely right (and un-electable).

    I'll take a moderate socialist democrat like Al Franken, at this point un-electable but let's see what happens. Heavens to Betsey, he is building bi-partisan coalitions in Congress. Leave it to a comedian to make the impossible happen.
    Peace, Love, and Local Grindz

    People who form FIRM opinions with so little knowledge only pretend to be open-minded. They select their facts like food from a buffet. David R. Dow

  18. #18

    Default Re: The 2010 Elections

    Quote Originally Posted by matapule View Post
    The Tea Party is scary to me because it is infiltrated and in some cases operated by sympathizers to the KKK, White Supremacists, Neo Nutzis, fundamentalist Christians whose agenda is 180 degrees opposite to mine.
    Matapule, I think you know that the teabaggers carrying signs labeling Obama as a "socialist" and "Kenyan" would have been condemning him for another reason if this was 1965 instead of 2010, right?

    The Tea Party proponents want to be taken seriously as a mainstream movement. And yet, how can they expect to be embraced by the moderates when you have a guy like Dale Robertson (founder of TeaParty.Org) carrying around signs like this?



    Quote Originally Posted by matapule View Post
    I have very close relatives who are active members of the Tea Party movement and they have shut me out of their lives because I won't subscribe 100% to their agenda. To them it is all are nothing. What a shame..
    AFAIAC, red flags always go up whenever any political organization or social movement allows for no diversity of opinion on certain key issues and purges those who do not pass a litmus test. Past history has shown us how these movements have come and gone. Sooner or later, they end up imploding. You just hope it happens before they cause too much damage.
    This post may contain an opinion that may conflict with your opinion. Do not take it personal. Polite discussion of difference of opinion is welcome.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kahalu`u Stream
    Posts
    2,933

    Thumbs up Re: The 2010 Elections

    Quote Originally Posted by Random View Post
    I VOTE FOR TOTAL ISOLATIONISM AND STOP FIXING THE WORLD!!!!!
    AGREED!

    At least we should keep our noses out of other peoples' businesses' until we can do a good enough job fixing our own!
    Be Yourself. Everyone Else Is Taken!
    ~ ~
    Kaʻonohiʻulaʻokahōkūmiomioʻehiku
    Spreading the virus of ALOHA.
    Oh Chu. If only you could have seen what I've seen, with your eyes.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    No. California
    Posts
    2,556

    Default Re: The 2010 Elections

    Someone needs to teach Mr. Robertson how to use spell check!
    "Democracy is the only system that persists in asking the powers that be whether they are the powers that ought to be."
    – Sydney J. Harris

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Returned to Molokai
    Posts
    3,419

    Default Re: The 2010 Elections

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaonohi View Post
    AGREED!

    At least we should keep our noses out of other peoples' businesses' until we can do a good enough job fixing our own!
    Good, we should also remove ourselves from the UN, have UN relocated outside USA.
    Beijing 8-08-08 to 8-24-08

    Tiananmen Square 4-15-89 to 6-04-89

  22. #22

    Default Re: The 2010 Elections

    Here in Cal we have a cautionary tale on the true meaning of the Republican supreme ct's Citizens United case making it possible for corporations to buy elections--proposition 16, put on the ballot by Pacific Gas & Electric and other energy interests. If passed (during a historically low turnout primary election) it amends the Cal constitution to require a 2/3 vote before any gvt. entity could get into the electricity business. It will be recalled that after a relentless advertising campaign by Texas energy speculators California voters were scammed into voting away electricity regulation in the '90's, immediately followed by vast rate increases. The only island of sanity was the publicly owned LA Dept of Water & Power. Many counties and cities made moves to become municipal power sources to get reasonable rates for their citizens. If prop. 16 passes it will be basically impossible for the public to escape whatever vast rate increases the energy companies chose to impose, other than disconnecting from the system and living without electricity.

    The Cal airwaves have been saturated with well crafted ads in favor of 16, with literally nothing against it. "Let us rob you" is the real message, but it is so artfully presented--attractive young ladies, sweet voices, all sounding so reasonable, gee, we just want the right to vote before our city does anything to save us from rate increases. This is what you can expect under Citizens United. I will be very surprised if this monstrosity doesn't pass. It will be interesting to see how soon, and how much, electricity rates jack up.

  23. #23

    Default Re: The 2010 Elections

    You must have your papers in order in Arizona, to prove that you are a citizen, to prove that you have the right to be where you are. Burden of proof shifted from presumption of innocence, quite historic and considered quite beneficial under common law, to presumption of guilt, with the citizen required to prove innocence at a moment's notice. And the public loves it. Just as the GOP succeeded with Nixon's anti-Black southern strategy in the late '60's so now it succeeds again with anti-Latino strategy. Just appeal to the worst in people and they never let you down. You can see how Hitler got away with murdering 6 million, just marginalize them in the public mind, make the public hate them, and voila~holocaust. Appealing to the worst human instincts does not make this a better or a stronger country, it makes it worse. But who cares about that, and as to shifting the burden of proof, it will be years before anyone recognizes a problem with that.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Mō‘ili‘ili
    Posts
    2,456

    Lightbulb Re: The 2010 Elections

    Quote Originally Posted by Frankie's Market View Post
    The Tea Party proponents want to be taken seriously as a mainstream movement. And yet, how can they expect to be embraced by the moderates
    I realize that HT’rs as liberal as you and Kalalau are tonedeaf to the changing attitudes of the politically active majority in this country, but perhaps I can open a door for you. When most politicians run as a “moderate” they do it almost exclusively to get votes from “Red” states and “Blue” states, or locally, in “red” and “blue” counties. Frankly, the all-time low approval rating of Congress is due to disillusionment with their Congressman/woman’s practical application of this deliberately vague label.

    People are a lot smarter then you think, Frankie. Those who actually pay attention to elections and vote have woken up to the fact that voting for a moderate can be extremely dangerous. You don’t know which way they are going to vote on any given issue. They might vote for a liberal bill if kickbacks make its way into their campaign fund. Or they might vote for a conservative bill if the price is right.

    Thankfully, according to tea party leader Jenny Beth Martin, this movement is 15 million strong and growing and a phenomenal pace. Here’s another fruit of the movement (whoohooo!!! Ron Paul’s son!!!! ):

    Rand Paul’s victory also a win for Tea Party

    By Peter Hamby, CNN Political Producer
    May 19, 2010 4:19 a.m. EDT


    Bowling Green, Kentucky (CNN) — Rand Paul, a first-time political candidate and beloved figure among Tea Party activists, captured the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate in Kentucky on Tuesday.

    Paul’s opponent, Secretary of State Trey Grayson, conceded the race as polls showed Paul cruising to a sizable victory.

    We can’t be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans.

    — U.S. President Bill Clinton
    USA TODAY, page 2A
    11 March 1993

  25. #25

    Default Re: The 2010 Elections

    We took a drive out to some hot springs in the far east county, went thru 2 internal border check points like they used to have in East Germany on the way out, and one on the way back. Thank God I am white, I can't imagine how frightening it would be to be a brown man facing all those rifles and prison lights in your face here in our free country. Of course its only a matter of time until Latino voters take effective control of some state, New Mexico maybe, and then big brown cops with rifles and prison lights will be demanding documents from us white people. Maybe when the shoe is on the other foot white people will understand the basic problem with presumption of guilt.

    Yesterday's election wasn't too bad, really. Blanche Lincoln didn't clear her primary because she alienated liberal Democratic support. Democrats retained Murtha's Pennsylvania seat against a totally HUGE Republican campaign.

    Turns out the recent NRA convention did not allow people to bring in loaded guns. Oh thats fine for churches and bars, but again, people understand a problem a bit better when its their ox getting gored. Do you think people should be allowed to take loaded guns on planes, or to schools? Why or why not?

    What are the horrible liberal things the tea partiers want to do away with? Medicare? Social Security? Publicly owned water systems, roads, schools? Environmental laws? (Do you think the Gulf oil spill woke anybody up to the need for environmental protection, or not?) Big spending? Like for 2 needless wars that idiot boy got us into? Don't forget, Clinton left a $500 billion surplus and idiot boy not only ran thru all of that money, his 2 wars plus tax breaks for billionaires bankrupted us. Big spending for needless presidential vanity is fine with the tea party mentality, but let it get spent on something that the country actually needs and whoa, thats socialism!

Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •