Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Perez Hilton

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Perez Hilton

    Originally posted by Frankie's Market View Post
    That you're referring to Perez as being in the "entertainment business" in the context of this discussion,.... well, whatever you say. I don't think the seriousness of Hilton's actions can be minimized.
    Uh, FM, you Do realize that Perez Hilton did not take the upskirt photo, right? And you do realize that 'Alaska Nebraska' has bodyguards and security that could easily have prevented any photog from being able to get such an, emmmm.....personal shot of her. Bottom line - she and her people almost certainly allowed this to happen. I think your anger and disgust are misdirected.
    ~ This is the strangest life I've ever known ~

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Perez Hilton

      "The time has come, the walrus said, to talk of many things..."

      Like how minors aren't so minor no more, and how these pigs sprout wings.

      Distributing child porn is reprehensible, photo-shopped or not, IMNSHO, but we also gotta realize these minors don't think they are minors - despite the laws - and often put themselves in compromising positions.

      Let's first get all the facts, then drop the bomb.

      K

      |
      V
      v
      Last edited by Kaonohi; June 16, 2010, 12:57 PM. Reason: Ed is on no sidE
      Be Yourself. Everyone Else Is Taken!
      ~ ~
      Kaʻonohiʻulaʻokahōkūmiomioʻehiku
      Spreading the virus of ALOHA.
      Oh Chu. If only you could have seen what I've seen, with your eyes.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Perez Hilton

        Originally posted by turtlegirl View Post
        Uh, FM, you Do realize that Perez Hilton did not take the upskirt photo, right?
        He may not have taken the photo. However, he provided a link that led to the incriminating photo. That is against the law.

        Originally posted by turtlegirl View Post
        And you do realize that 'Alaska Nebraska' has bodyguards and security that could easily have prevented any photog from being able to get such an, emmmm.....personal shot of her. Bottom line - she and her people almost certainly allowed this to happen.
        As I already stated to LN, minors can't consent to allow themselves to be exploited pornographically. So emphatically repeating the claim that "Miley wanted this" doesn't change the fact that Hilton broke the law, even if it was true.

        Originally posted by turtlegirl View Post
        I think your anger and disgust are misdirected.
        Fine. We'll just have to agree to disagree.
        This post may contain an opinion that may conflict with your opinion. Do not take it personal. Polite discussion of difference of opinion is welcome.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Perez Hilton

          NY Times Sunday Magazine article on "pornification" of young girls in our society (mentions some of MC's recent behavior) at http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/13/ma...ob-wwln-t.html

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Perez Hilton

            I've always thought PH was a disgusting pig. I think he crossed a line, but I also think it was a set up. While she's a minor and may not be able to make those decisions, her adult handlers can...and they are also the ones who would have to arrange for access to her at that particular moment. But Scum-Bag shouldn't have picked it up and ran with it as she is a minor. For once (FOR ONCE), he could have taken the higher road. But of course he didn't.

            Can't think of anything creative this time

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Perez Hilton

              Originally posted by surlygirly View Post
              I've always thought PH was a disgusting pig.
              No disrespect to Perez Hilton, but he physically resembles a pig.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Miley Cyrus

                I DVR'd David Letterman's show last Thursday night because one of his guests was Miley Cyrus. Usually if she's on the tube I'll switch the channel, but after this thread I figured I'd see where she's at these days.
                And where she's at was doing some song from her new "Can't Be Tamed" album, complete with lots of her bump-and-grind dancing and a few instances of her Michael Jackson-like crotch grabbing.
                If she was my daughter she'd be grounded until she turned 40.
                .
                .

                That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Miley Cyrus

                  Originally posted by LikaNui View Post
                  And where she's at was doing some song from her new "Can't Be Tamed" album, complete with lots of her bump-and-grind dancing and a few instances of her Michael Jackson-like crotch grabbing.
                  If she was my daughter she'd be grounded until she turned 40.
                  She's just afraid that Disney has turned her into Hilary Duff.

                  Or was that Britney Spears? Lindsay Lohan?

                  Maybe if Miley plays her cards right she'll get on "Dancing With The Stars"...
                  Youth may be wasted on the young, but retirement is wasted on the old.
                  Live like you're dying, invest like you're immortal.
                  We grow old if we stop playing, but it's never too late to have a happy childhood.
                  Forget about who you were-- discover who you are.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Perez Hilton

                    Originally posted by surlygirly View Post
                    I've always thought PH was a disgusting pig. I think he crossed a line, but I also think it was a set up. While she's a minor and may not be able to make those decisions, her adult handlers can...and they are also the ones who would have to arrange for access to her at that particular moment. But Scum-Bag shouldn't have picked it up and ran with it as she is a minor. For once (FOR ONCE), he could have taken the higher road. But of course he didn't.
                    One positive from this whole sordid affair. At least the discussion has dispelled some myths and misperceptions that people were apparently holding, up until now.

                    1) Minors can't legally consent to pornographically exposing themselves, anymore than they can to having sexual relations. An adult involved in either crime can't use, "But the kid said it was okay to do it" as an excuse.

                    2) It is illegal to distribute kiddie porn, even if one did not take the picture.

                    3) Distributing child porn that was "created" through photoshop or any other type of editing process is still illegal.
                    This post may contain an opinion that may conflict with your opinion. Do not take it personal. Polite discussion of difference of opinion is welcome.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Perez Hilton

                      Unless you're Reuters and it was at a public event.

                      Check 2snaps.tv

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Perez Hilton

                        Oops he did it again.
                        ___
                        "Be god to each other."

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Perez Hilton

                          That's the one Reuters says is legal.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Perez Hilton

                            Originally posted by Peshkwe View Post
                            That's the one Reuters says is legal.
                            'Course,... Reuters is a company based in the UK, so they don't have to worry about American laws when it comes to matter like this.

                            No one at Reuters may face prosecution, but the organization's journalistic reputation has taken a shot. The Boston Herald's Lauren Beckham Falcone gives her take.

                            Congratulations, Reuters. You got the money shot.

                            And all it cost was your integrity.

                            The “respected” news service released an image of 17-year-old Miley Cyrus’ uncovered crotch (that again?) yesterday, taken during her performance at the Much Music Awards in Toronto Sunday night.
                            Of course, people are blaming Miley. Miss “Pole Dance at the Teen Choice Awards” wore the skimpy outfit, right? She’s the one who “Can’t Be Tamed,” according to her new CD. But she’s also a 17-year-old dressed in what is pretty much a leotard.

                            Professional photographers shooting 100 photos a minute are going to get some indecent shots. So let the Beavis and Buttheads with middle school mentalities at Reuters’ photo desk get a sleazy chuckle out of the photo. Then trash it.

                            Yes, Miley Cyrus is pushing the sexual envelope these days and probably not making the best decisions, attire-wise.

                            But she’s still a kid.

                            What’s Reuters excuse?
                            This post may contain an opinion that may conflict with your opinion. Do not take it personal. Polite discussion of difference of opinion is welcome.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Perez Hilton

                              If he wants to publish private parts photos of stars. There's always Lady Ga Ga, legally.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Perez Hilton

                                That's pretty much what I was trying to say, what Lauren Beckham Falcone did. I wish he'd just go away, but I know that would never happen. I especially hate how he feels the need to decorate the pictures on his site with the little white drippings. So necessary and disgusting.

                                Can't think of anything creative this time

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X