Re: Tsunami Warning Saturday Oct. 27, 2012

Originally Posted by
Frankie's Market
Yes, Sue. I'm well aware of the difference in distance. Please read my comment above. Once again, I'm not blaming anyone for the short evacuation time.

Originally Posted by
tutusue
It kinda sounded like it, FM.
If you read my statement as one that is scapegoating somebody, then whatever. I can honestly say that wasn't my intention.

Originally Posted by
Frankie's Market
Charles McCreery is saying no buoys were in the path of this particular tsunami.

Originally Posted by
tutusue
I heard words to the contrary on one of the newscasts Sat. nite. Sorry, can't remember which one.
Things that are said in the heat of the moment are often not as accurate after the experts have had some time to sit down and carefully consider all the data that has been gathered. Hawaii News Now has also interviewed the PTWC's director, where he emphasized the total absence of buoys placed in the tsunami's path and the possibility of re-positioning the buoys.
http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/story/1...urdays-tsunami
The director of the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center said NOAA has 32 DART buoys strategically placed in the Pacific Ocean, but
none in the area of Saturday's earthquake.
He said the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center, its counterpart in Alaska, NOAA headquarters and the National Data Buoy Center will talk about moving a dart buoy to the blind spot.
"That will definitely be high on the list of things to discuss," he said. "Can we reposition something off of that area given that now we know it's a tsunami-genic zone?"
But it's a balancing act. You don't want to move a buoy and leave yourself vulnerable in another area.
Last edited by Frankie's Market; October 30th, 2012 at 09:09 PM.
This post may contain an opinion that may conflict with your opinion. Do not take it personal. Polite discussion of difference of opinion is welcome.
Bookmarks