U.S. cursed by US Right Wing

[waioli kai]

Right Wing Lies cost Lives

Freedom is on the March But, of what are those clouds? U.S. cities?? Foreign cities?? Babylonian blood fields?? Future outposts for the maintenance and furtherance or corporUSism built on recently past (barely, when even, little more than six generations removed from 1776 BCE)
when not otherwise ongoing, savage justUS Freedom, founded on wealth born of annihilations of, militarist expropriations of native peoples communities, where and when not mere removals of and sanctions on such peoples will sufficeUS.
---------------------

It's not Fascism when we do it.

Oregon Governor Ted Kulongoski rails against Iraq war plans

6/17/2005 12:31:59 PM

by J. Roxbury

SALEM, Ore. - Gov. Ted Kulongoski is calling the use of Oregon National Guard troops in Iraq unreasonable, unfair and unconscionable.

They are the strongest statements so far by the governor concerning the U.S.-led occupation in Iraq, the use of volunteer soldiers and the fact that the President has yet to talk about an exit strategy.

He also expressed concerns about the effect the war is having on the Iraqi people.

"These are very proud and independent people and they will not tolerate very long an occupying army in their country," he said.

.... "I think it is unreasonable. It is unfair and it is actually unconscionable to me that the Defense Department thinks that they can rotate these National Guard troops two, three and four times into these areas of conflict."

Right Wing Lies cost Lives
while
CheneyBushCarlyle, Inc.
leads terrorUSt$ corporatUSt$ efforts to exploit oil reserves everywhere.

[Miulang]

Re: U.S. cursed by US Right Wing

Hui Waioli: Was wondering where you went...long time no see, yeah?

All it takes is one small little pebble to start a landslide. All it takes is one little vibration to start an avalanche...all it takes is one little unofficial hearing on something as "inconsequential" as the Downing Street Memo and the other leaked British top secret documents to have some fence-straddling Republicans and moderate Democrats fear for their own political lives and want to turn their backs to the Administration by finally saying, "NO"...that's all it takes...we'll now just have to keep up the pressure to find out the truth.

If it turns out that the truth is more like what the White House wants the American public to believe, then so be it. But the fact that the White House keeps stonewalling and denying everything, rather than saying, "OK, here are facts to refute what the other side is saying", strikes me as being a little suspicious.

I'm willing to give the White House its day in court, but it doesn't seem to want to put itself in the position of having to defend itself, other than by discounting all the allegations without having a shred of proof that the allegations are false. In a court of law, that wouldn't hold much water.

Miulang

[waioli kai]

Tolerance for inequality and own lies, US conservative summed up

Hui Waioli: Was wondering where you went...long time no see, yeah?

Oui, a long time, in some respects. In the interim cheneybUSh War Iraq has eaten to death another hundred U.S. military members and more than a thousand Muslim peoples, and the Cheney regime has not even taken a burp yet. When the cheneybUSh regime ingests its 2000th Operation Iraqi Liberation dead U.S. soldier, opening another new year beginning the 21st Christian century, is the U.S. prepared to follow their corporatUSt regime tread over a path (a dead-end?) paved with another 1000 U.S. soldier bodies, over untold thousands of Iraqis?

...all it takes is one little unofficial hearing on something as "inconsequential" as the Downing Street Memo and the other leaked British top secret documents to have some fence-straddling Republicans and moderate Democrats fear for their own political lives and want to turn their backs to the Administration by finally saying, "NO"...that's all it takes...we'll now just have to keep up the pressure to find out the truth.

Bush should have been reelected in 2004 just to give enough time to impeach him and /or his administration, i.e,. especially to impeach Cheney.

I'm willing to give the White House its day in court, but it doesn't seem to want to put itself in the position of having to defend itself, other than by discounting all the allegations without having a shred of proof that the allegations are false.

With a Republican Congress, Republican Justices, Republicans at the bankrupt helm of government, society, foreign policy, military and economy, it seems that it is more likely that the ruse of the fiscal bankruptcy of the US economy will be exposed for what it is (that is, exposed for what it is not: as in, not sound), than will be exposed (via impeachment of CheneyBush)
the moral bankruptcy of U.S. Republican led government and foreign policy.

http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/r...politics.shtml
Researchers help define what makes a political conservative

- - - - BERKELEY – Politically conservative agendas may range from supporting the Vietnam War to upholding traditional moral and religious values to opposing welfare. But are there consistent underlying motivations?


Four researchers who culled through 50 years of research literature about the psychology of conservatism report that at the core of political conservatism is the resistance to change and a tolerance for inequality, and that some of the common psychological factors linked to political conservatism include:

Fear and aggression
Dogmatism and intolerance of ambiguity
Uncertainty avoidance
Need for cognitive closure
Terror management

The mind of a conservative summed up in those few phrases. For the full text, goto:

http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/r...politics.shtml


Kathleen Maclay, Media Relations | 22 July 2003 (revised 7/25/03)

=======

Terror managers of the U.S., terrorUSts retire with corporate and government pensions coupled with what effectively amounts to immunity to prosecution in U.S. courts.

[Miulang]

Re: U.S. cursed by US Right Wing

If the Congress and Senate do impeach Bush, they'd better kick out Cheney and Rummy and Wolfowitz and Rice, etc. etc. Only going after Bush would be like killing the sacrificial lamb. The most dangerous of the "triad of evil" (Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld) is Cheney, and he would take over if only Bush was indicted. That man is vindictive and dangerous.

Miulang

[waioli kai]

WHAT Absolute RUBBISH Mr. President!!

For Immediate Release, Office of the Press Secretary, June 27, 2005

President Welcomes German Chancellor to the White House

The Oval Office, 11:45 A.M. EDT

Question: Iran has a new leader. Was the election free and fair?

PRESIDENT BUSH: It's never free and fair -- free and fair when a group of people, unelected people, get to decide who's on the ballot.

U.S. election ballots in all 50 states are free and fair
because of what ??

??Because in U.S. states there are groups of "elected people" (ie elected partisans of the US Duopoly political machine)
who amongst themselves decide who's on the primary and general election ballots for the general public to vote on? WHAT Absolute RUBBISH Mr. President!! By your own criterion Mr. President, your own deluded country has yet have a "free and fair election"!!

[waioli kai]

President's Iraq War pep rally June 2005

Casa de Blanco, D.C., from Office of the Press Secretary June 28, 2005, 8:02 P.M. EDT
President Addresses Nation, Discusses Iraq, War on Terror Fort Bragg, N.C.
...We continued our efforts to help them rebuild their country.

Rebuild their country? Following more than a decade of being warred upon by the United States' US?
-------

Rebuilding a country after three decades of tyranny is hard, and rebuilding while at war is even harder.

Three decades of tyranny? Yes, one deacade being Iraq's last one which consisted of being warred upon by the United States' US
-------

Our progress has been uneven, but progress is being made

...progress, one desolated city at a time... a time in hours, days, weeks, months...whatever it takes "to spread US's sense of 'Freedom' ".
-------

Whatever our differences in the past, the world understands that success in Iraq is critical to the security of our nations.

The world understands that (US) success is critical to the security of our nations? "Our nations"... who is "our" in "our nations"?
-------

Today, dozens of nations are working toward a common objective: an Iraq that can defend itself, defeat its enemies, and secure its freedom.

An Iraq that can defend itself against what? Against militant anti-terrorUSt$, against militant anti-corporatUSt$? Against hometown American children who are armed by US to march upon the world invoking US's Gawd's name and the dispensation of His blessings upon all... too often confusing what is fury with that which is blessing.
-------

an Iraq that can defend itself, defeat its enemies, and secure its freedom.

An Iraq that can defeat its enemies? What enemies of Iraq follow in the wake of US's "Shock and All"? Could they not be instead: enemies of United States' US?
-------

an Iraq that can defend itself, defeat its enemies, and secure its freedom.

Iraq can secure its freedom? Iraq can secure "its" freedom from the remnants of a quarter century of US meddlings, US deceptions, US wars? Let's hope so ? !!?
-------

Is the sacrifice worth it? Yes it is worth it.

Was "the sacrifice" ..expected by the President? ...expected by the Vice-President"? ..expected by the to Presidents' "Neo-Cons"? expected by anyone other than those of the United States who thought the whole CheneyBush War on Iraq was a sham and a shame from before the 2003 US invasion of Iraq.
-------

Second, we are embedding coalition "transition teams" inside Iraqi units.

Military transition teams, business/economic transition teams, engineering transition teams, government transition teams, and, of course, though far from being an exhaustive list of "transition teams", 'security' transition teams.
-------

These teams are made up of coalition officers and non-commissioned officers who live, work, and fight together with their Iraqi comrades.

Comrades? Has AmericanEnglish language finally gotten the "communist" tinge out of the word "comrade"? Oh yeah...forgot..."US's motto: communism is Dead, and We killed it."
-------

Under US command, they (the U.S. military "transition teams" are providing battlefield advice and assistance to Iraqi forces during combat operations. Between battles, they are assisting the Iraqis with important skills, such as urban combat, and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance techniques.

"Urban combat, and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance techniques" ... the first technique is too rarely engaged in in the United States, so the best and cheapest training ground for urban combat techniques is Iraqi towns and neighborhoods.

" 'Important' intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance techniques", much needed for the success of US's Freedom March over Earth.
-------

Third, we're working with the Iraqi Ministries of Interior and Defense to improve their capabilities to coordinate anti-terrorist operations

The terrorists do not understand America.

Terrorists can kill the innocent, but they cannot stop the advance of freedom

But if "the terrorists" did understand 'the terrorUSt$', "the terrorists" would do what? Lay down and and let 'US's freedom' march over them?
-------

We fight today because Iraq now carries the hope of freedom in a vital region of the world,...

Iraqi peoples hoped for peace in 2003, at least so did hope those Iraqi who were not in exile c/o US Neocons-r-US, US CorporatUSt$.
Such Iraqi hopes for peace were not recognized by US militarists in 2003, nor for twenty years prior. Are peoples hopes for peace to be morally superceded by US designs for other peoples "freedom as defined by US"?
"Iraq...a vital region of the world"? Vital to whom? To those who live there? To corporatUSt$ oil, banking, israel, militarUSt$ interests.
-------

...and the rise of democracy will be the ultimate triumph over radicalism and terror.

The rise of democrUSy in Iraq and the bloody march of US's spreading "freedom" in Iraq is a US Neo-con dream turned nightmare. Is one nightmare to triumph over another?

-------

And we fight today because terrorists want to attack our country and kill our citizens, and Iraq is where they are making their stand.

Iraq is where terrorists (ie, militant anti-terrorUSt$) are making their lastest stand because militarUSt$ coporatUSt$ have in Iraq created a place for militant anti-terrorUSt$ to stand.
-------

So we'll fight them there, we'll fight them across the world, and we will stay in the fight until the fight is won.

For US to be fighting "them" in Iraq, across
(not 'around' the world? so the world is flat?)
-------

America has done difficult work before.

Wars on Native Americans, Wars on Mexico, War on American Secessionists, War on Philippines, War on Vietnam, War on Nicargua, War on Grenada, War on Panama, War on Iraq ... difficult 'work' indeed, but, they say, somebody's got to do gawd's work/wars.
-------

Americans have always held firm, because we have always believed in certain truths. We know that if evil is not confronted, it gains in strength and audacity, and returns to strike us again. We know that when the work
(a Neo-con instigated war) is hard, the proper response is not retreat, it is courage.

There is much that is exremely improper when a person who was born and raised with a silver spoon in his mouth (and at times in his nostrils)
speaks of "work", muchless "hard work".
-------

And we know that this great ideal of human freedom entrusted to us in a special way, and that the ideal of liberty is worth defending.

"This great ideal of human freedom entrusted" (by whom?) to US Republicans in all three branches of the U.S. government? Sure, the ideal of liberty is worth defending, but is it not the promotion of the US ideal of liberty that U.S. soldiers are killing and dying for in Iraq and Afghanistan?
-------

In this war, we have lost good men and women who left our shores to defend freedom and did not live to make the journey home.

Unfortunately, the "good (U.S. military) men and women who left our shores and did not live to make the journey home" were no more defending freedom than they were defending liberty in Iraq: they were, under orders of their commander-in-chief, promoting their Commander's ideas of liberty and freedom so that, presumably thanks to US Neocons, someday there might actually be in Iraq liberty and freedom (and peace? security?) that can then exist, and in turn, can then actually be something real that can be defended.
-------

The best way to honor the lives that have been given in this struggle is to complete the mission.

When "mission" is defined as --> a specific task with which a person or a group is charged; e.g., a definite military, naval, or aerospace task --
it is clear that the CheneyBush administration prefers a very broad, if not indeed invalid, interpretation of what is meant by the word
"mission". To the CheneyBush cabal, a mission need not necessarily be a specific task, nor need a mission be a definite task; instead, "the mission" can be whatever the CheneyBush cabal says, wants and/or implies "the mission " is.
-------

When the history of this period is written, the liberation of Afghanistan and the liberation of Iraq will be remembered as great turning points in the story of freedom.

Some "great turning points in the story of freedom" have been the election and re-election of Reagan, the election of Bush1, the election and re-election of Bush2, the election and re-election of a Republican Congress ... turning points of greatly downward direction.
-------

After September the 11th, 2001, I told the American people that the road ahead would be difficult, and that we would prevail.

Got correct the prediction about the difficulty of "the
(CheneyBush chosen) road ahead", but it remains to be seen what is "the (CheneyBush) mission", and what it means to "prevail"
in CheneyBush-speak.

[waioli kai]

The Provocateur State: to "combat terrorism" by causing it!

excerpt Quote:

The Provocateur State:

Is the CIA Behind the Iraqi "Insurgents"--and Global Terrorism?

by Frank Morales
WORLD WAR 4 REPORT, May 10, 2005 http://WW4Report.com
www.globalresearch.ca 12 May 2005
The URL of this article is: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/MOR505A.html


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The requirement of an ever-escalating level of social violence to meet the political and economic needs of the insatiable "anti-terrorist complex" is the essence of the new US militarism.

What is now openly billed as "permanent war" ultimately serves the geo-political ends of social control in the interests of US corporate domination, much as the anti-communist crusade of the now-exhausted Cold War did.

Back in 2002, following the trauma of 9-11, Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld predicted there would be more terrorist attacks against the American people and civilization at large. How could he be so sure of that? Perhaps because these attacks would be instigated on the order of the Honorable Mr. Rumsfeld. According to Los Angeles Times military analyst William Arkin, writing Oct. 27, 2002, Rumsfeld set out to create a secret army, "a super-Intelligence Support Activity" network that would "bring together CIA and military covert action, information warfare, intelligence, and cover and deception," to stir the pot of spiraling global violence.

According to a classified document prepared for Rumsfeld by his Defense Science Board, the new organization--the "Proactive, Preemptive Operations Group (P2OG)"--would actually carry out secret missions designed to provoke terrorist groups into committing violent acts. The P2OG, a 100-member, so-called "counter-terrorist" organization with a $100-million-a-year budget, would ostensibly target "terrorist leaders," but according to P2OG documents procured by Arkin, would in fact carry out missions designed to "stimulate reactions" among "terrorist groups"--which, according to the Defense Secretary's logic, would subsequently expose them to "counter-attack" by the good guys. In other words, the plan is to execute secret military operations (assassinations, sabotage, "deception") which would intentionally result in terrorist attacks on innocent people, including Americans--essentially, to "combat terrorism" by causing it!

This notion is currently being applied to the problem of the Iraqi "insurgency," it seems. According to a May 1, 2005 report by Peter Maass in the New York Times Magazine, two of the top US advisers to Iraqi paramilitary commandos fighting the insurgents are veterans of US counterinsurgency operations in Latin America. Loaning credence to recent media speculation about the "Salvadorization" of Iraq, the report notes that one adviser currently in Iraq is James Steele, who led a team of 55 US Army Special Forces advisers in El Salvador in the 1980s. Maass writes that these advisors "trained front-line battalions that were accused of significant human rights abuses."

The current senior US adviser at the Iraqi Interior Ministry, which Maass writes "has operational control over the commandos," is former top US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) official Steve Casteel, who worked "alongside local forces" in the US-sponsored "Drug War" in Bolivia, Peru and Colombia, "where he was involved in the hunt for Pablo Escobar, the head of the Medellin cocaine cartel."

The US "drug war" in Latin America also serves as a cover for ongoing counterinsurgency, employing terrorist methods to achieve two aims: one, actually combating genuine insurgency; two, the ratcheting up of a "strategy of tension," heightened social violence designed to induce fear among the citizenry and the subsequent call for greater "security."

This was the essence, for example, of Operation Gladio, a decades-long covert campaign of provocateur-style terrorism and deceit. The ostensible purpose of Gladio, officially launched as a covert NATO program in 1952, was to establish a clandestine network of "stay-behind" teams which would organize armed resistance and sabotage in the event of a Soviet invasion of Western Europe. But the network actually took a far more proactive role. Directed by US/NATO intelligence services of the West against their own populations, Operation Gladio led to possibly hundreds of innocent people being killed or maimed in "terrorist" attacks which were then blamed on "leftist subversives" or other political opponents. The most notorious such attack was the 1980 bombing of the train station at Bologna, which left 85 dead. Initially blamed on left-wing radicals, the blast was revealed upon investigation to be the work of an ultra-right network linked to the Italy's Gladio team; four Italian neo-fascists were eventually convicted of the crime.

The purpose was again twofold: to demonize designated enemies (the "communists") and to frighten the public into supporting ever-increasing powers for the national security state. It appears the Pentagon has been implementing Gladio-style operations for quite some time--possibly including 9-11. A stretch? Maybe not.

Witness the US Joint Chiefs discussion of "Operation Northwoods" back in 1962, a plan to blow up U.S. "assets"--including U.S. citizens--in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. Later, US Army Field Manual 30-31B, entitled "Stability Operations Intelligence - Special Fields," dated March 18, 1970 and signed by Gen. William C Westmoreland, promoted terrorist attacks (and the planting of false evidence) in public places which were then to be blamed on "communists" and "socialists." It called for the execution of terrorist attacks throughout Western Europe, carried out through a network of covert US/NATO armies, in order to convince European governments of "the communist threat."

What is striking is that during this period the primary source for US government info on the Russian "threat" was coming from the Gehlen Organization, Hitlers eastern front intelligence apparatus, which in the aftermath of World War II had cut a deal with the CIA's Allen Dulles and worked out of Fort Hunt, just outside Washington DC, before being relocated back to Munich. Headed up by super-spy Nazi General Reinhard Gehlen, the Org's "special operations" expertise was heeded, financed and well-protected by U.S. tax dollars well into the 1970's. Could the Gehlen Org have had an influence in the production of FM 30-31B?

According to FM 30-31B,

"there may be times when Host Country Governments show passivity or indecision in the face of communist subversion and according to the interpretation of the US secret services do not react with sufficient effectiveness. Most often such situations come about when the revolutionaries temporarily renounce the use of force and thus hope to gain an advantage, as the leaders of the host country wrongly consider the situation to be secure. US army intelligence must have the means of launching special operations which will convince Host Country Governments and public opinion of the reality of the insurgent danger."

The U.S. Army now claims the document was a Russian forgery. (continues at above link)

[waioli kai]

Doctrines of Fascism

Considering:

A Doctrine of Fascism was written by Giovanni Gentile which Mussolini signed the article and it was officially attributed to him. It was first published in the Enciclopedia Italiana of 1932.

A key concept was that fascism was a rejection of previous models: "Granted that the XIXth century was the century of socialism, liberalism, democracy, this does not mean that the XXth century must also be the century of socialism, liberalism, democracy. Political doctrines pass; nations remain.
We are free to believe that this is the century of authority, a century tending to the 'right', a Fascist century."

Mussolini recalled and destroyed all available copies of the Doctrine of Fascism in April 1940 after he had second thoughts about certain phrases in it. However copies in Italian and English survived, and are available in many libraries around the world.

Here are some typical Mussolini quotes from the original English translations:

The Fascist conception of the State is all-embracing; outside of it no human or spiritual values can exist, much less have value. Thus understood, Fascism is totalitarian, and the Fascist State--a synthesis and a unit inclusive of all values--interprets, develops, and potentiates the whole life of a people. (p. 14)

Fascism recognises the real needs which gave rise to socialism and trade-unionism, giving them due weight in the guild or corporative system in which divergent interests are coordinated and harmonised in the unity of the State. (p.15)

"It may be objected that this program implies a return to the guilds (corporazioni). No matter!... I therefore hope this assembly will accept the economic claims advanced by national syndicalism." (p. 24)

Fascism is definitely and absolutely opposed to the doctrines of liberalism, both in the political and economic sphere. (p. 32)

The Fascist State lays claim to rule in the economic field no less than in others; it makes its action felt throughout the length and breadth of the country by means of its corporate, social, and educational institutions, and all the political, economic, and spiritual forces of the nation, organised in their respective associations, circulate within the State.
(p. 41).

Benito Mussolini, 1935,The Doctrine of Fascism, Firenze: Vallecchi Editore

***** ***

The Corporate State and its Organization (p. 133)

The corporate State considers that private enterprise in the sphere of production is the most effective and useful instrument in the interest of the nation. In view of the fact that private organisation of production is a function of national concern, the organiser of the enterprise is responsible to the State for the direction given to production.

State intervention in economic production arises only when private initiative is lacking or insufficient, or when the political interests of the State are involved. This intervention may take the form of control, assistance or direct management. (pp. 135-136)

Benito Mussolini, 1935, Fascism: Doctrine and Institutions, Rome: 'Ardita' Publishers.

--wikipedia.com; wk adding i , b , u .

::::: ::

The United States, dominated by militarism and corporatism is not just (because of its corporatist laws, corporatist economy and corporatist politics)the classic corporate state, it is the classic fascist state
(militarist imperialist capitalist corporatist). A common misconception in American thought is that because the United States' laws and military are not pathologically xenophobic the United States cannot possibly be a fascist state; however, just because liberals' together with most conservatives' nationalistic fervor significantly supercedes racist fervors in the United States, that does mean the United States is not a corporate state, not a fascist state.

[waioli kai]

30 million fascists in the U.S.?

Kalani: Are there any rightwing fascists in the U.S.?

Ka'ui: There are probably thirty million or so.

On this particular day there are likely to be more than 30 million. Of course just cheering at a parade, being awed by aircraft thrill shows andor entertained by nationalistic displays of fireworks are not participatory activities which of themselves make one to be one of the 30 million, plus or minus a few million or so "rightwing fascists in the U.S."

In some quarters of political, economic and social thought despite the important differences from other right-wing ideologies, fascism is almost universally considered to be a part of "the right." ( italics: wikipedia.com)

[waioli kai]

The Emegency President

Re: No government can forever call for Continuation of National Emergency

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
September 8, 2005

Notice: Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Certain Terrorist Attacks

Consistent with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency I declared on September 14, 2001, in Proclamation 7463, with respect to the terrorist attacks at the World Trade Center, New York, New York, and the Pentagon, and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on the United States.

By Executive Order 13223 of September 14, 2001 and Executive Order 13253 of January 16, 2002, I delegated authority to the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Transportation to order members of the Reserve Components to active duty and to waive certain statutory military personnel requirements. By Executive Order 13235 of November 16, 2001, I delegated authority to the Secretary of Defense to exercise certain emergency construction authority. By Executive Order 13286 of February 28, 2003, I transferred the authority delegated to the Secretary of Transportation in Executive Order 13223 to the Secretary of Homeland Security.

Because the terrorist threat continues, the national emergency declared on September 14, 2001, and the measures taken on September 14, 2001, November 16, 2001, and January 16, 2002, to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond September 14, 2005. Therefore, I am continuing in effect for an additional year the national emergency I declared on September 14, 2001, with respect to the terrorist threat. This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress.
GEORGE W. BUSH
THE WHITE HOUSE, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...050908-10.html
September 8, 2005.

In addition to being The War Presidency, this CheneyBush regime might as well call themselves The Emergency Presidency. Driven by impeachable urgency and blessings of a Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas US Supreme Court, they just had to have the U.S. Executive Branch as their own: "It's an emergency." Another emergency: they must save the democrUSy of the freedumb from being attacked by Iraqi nuclear, bio and chem weapons all the while restocking US weapons and researching and developing any weapon US wanted.

"The Emergency President", unless of course one takes into account the lower economic strata of his own nation or other truly humanitarian emergencies throughout the world.

[Pretender]

Re: U.S. cursed by US Right Wing

- there are a lot of decaffeinated brands on the market that are just as tasty as the real thing.

That movie was a classic!

[waioli kai]

Righwing Nonsense Collusion

Pretender:"That movie was a classic!"

Is this beginning of something new or this classic RNC? (i.e., Right-wing Nonsense Collusion)

[makana_hilton]

Re: U.S. cursed by US Right Wing

I'm here and now you should all fear me

[kimo55]

Re: U.S. cursed by US Right Wing

uh oh
kahala bra may have returned

[waioli kai]

Re: U.S. cursed by US Right Wing

uh oh
kahala bra may have returned

Really? I miis 'im !