Re: Obama v. The Birthers
Anapuni,
the world is extreme. It's not that I don't listen to those who disagree. If you go back and read the numerous posts addressing my posts, you won't find anything of substance that counters or offers meaningful information that constitutes a debate. I've mostly gotten attacks based on emotional and highly partisan convictions. No one has been courteous enough to provide data, news articles, documentaries, etc. to even allow a meaningful (and respectful) debate.
In addition, I have (and probably never will) cowardly put anyone on the "Ignore List" simply because they don't agree with me. Neither have I cussed at anyone. The topic of this thread is about Obama vs. the Birthers. Yet, oddly enough, most of its participants think everyone should agree with their position to make this thread a success or meaningful.
You say I offer no intelligent thought process. Let me offer this- Where is the intelligence of those who insist on Obama's eligibility without an ounce of documented evidence? The burden of proof is on him! If you're applying for a job, you are responsible to provide verification of your eligibility, not the other way around. I provided Jerry Coffee's MidWeek article that asks simple and honest questions. But none of you have the guts to respond to them. Where's the intelligence in that?
I'll boil it down for you. My opposition won't give an inch, because they know they automatically lose. And, if you say, "Yeah, Obama isn't a natural-born citizen. So what?" Then you're guilty of not agreeing with the provisions of the Constitution, which in turn questions your integrity and political persuasion. There is no way out, which is why the majority of you have to resort to being nasty and personal. I'm not the one being unintelligent here.
I'll also add that I'm not Jesus, but the pharisees killed him for similar reasons.
Originally posted by anapuni808
View Post
the world is extreme. It's not that I don't listen to those who disagree. If you go back and read the numerous posts addressing my posts, you won't find anything of substance that counters or offers meaningful information that constitutes a debate. I've mostly gotten attacks based on emotional and highly partisan convictions. No one has been courteous enough to provide data, news articles, documentaries, etc. to even allow a meaningful (and respectful) debate.
In addition, I have (and probably never will) cowardly put anyone on the "Ignore List" simply because they don't agree with me. Neither have I cussed at anyone. The topic of this thread is about Obama vs. the Birthers. Yet, oddly enough, most of its participants think everyone should agree with their position to make this thread a success or meaningful.
You say I offer no intelligent thought process. Let me offer this- Where is the intelligence of those who insist on Obama's eligibility without an ounce of documented evidence? The burden of proof is on him! If you're applying for a job, you are responsible to provide verification of your eligibility, not the other way around. I provided Jerry Coffee's MidWeek article that asks simple and honest questions. But none of you have the guts to respond to them. Where's the intelligence in that?
I'll boil it down for you. My opposition won't give an inch, because they know they automatically lose. And, if you say, "Yeah, Obama isn't a natural-born citizen. So what?" Then you're guilty of not agreeing with the provisions of the Constitution, which in turn questions your integrity and political persuasion. There is no way out, which is why the majority of you have to resort to being nasty and personal. I'm not the one being unintelligent here.
I'll also add that I'm not Jesus, but the pharisees killed him for similar reasons.
Comment