The way the stories are written would lead one to believe that the important facts surround sixteen employees of Chicken of the Sea in American Samoa who packed wahoo in cans and labeled it tuna. This MSN story, like the AP blurb that ran in Sunday's Advertiser or Star-Bulletin (sorry; I read both in one sitting and can't remember which), says that wahoo is a cheaper fish caught in tuna nets and packed separately (which we in Hawaii already know). But the headline should really read, "WAHOO IS CHEAPER THAN TUNA," because anyone who's bought the cans of Van Camps wahoo would be very interested to know that! It's two to three bucks per can! And, really. It's good, but it's not three-bucks-a-can good!
But hold on a second. This story at EastWestCenter.org, reporting on the same case, says that the tuna was the cheaper fish and labeled wahoo instead! Can I get a witness, please!
But hold on a second. This story at EastWestCenter.org, reporting on the same case, says that the tuna was the cheaper fish and labeled wahoo instead! Can I get a witness, please!
Comment