http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/02/18/ch....ap/index.html
"Man sues IBM over firing, says he's an internet addict
A man who was fired by IBM for visiting an adult chat room at work is suing the company for $5 million, claiming he is an Internet addict who deserves treatment and sympathy rather than dismissal...."
I sincerely doubt the drafters of the Americans with Disabilities Act ever foresaw the act being contorted in attempts to cover things like "internet addiction". but a couple who worked at IBM only got transferred for actually having sex on a desk? Who knew IBM was such a wild place to work?
"Man sues IBM over firing, says he's an internet addict
A man who was fired by IBM for visiting an adult chat room at work is suing the company for $5 million, claiming he is an Internet addict who deserves treatment and sympathy rather than dismissal...."
I sincerely doubt the drafters of the Americans with Disabilities Act ever foresaw the act being contorted in attempts to cover things like "internet addiction". but a couple who worked at IBM only got transferred for actually having sex on a desk? Who knew IBM was such a wild place to work?
Comment