Hello everyone,
I know that a lot of folks here have their own private blogs, and I know that soem of them include food review sites. I recently started one of my own, Locokinegrindz, and my first review for Restaurant Epic has received some negative feedback.
My only frustration over the two comments made for my review is that people don't seem to understand that odds are the night I went to eat at Epic there was something off about their preparation. I even say in my respones to their comments that I understand that restaurants have off nights. The last comment made from "Brent" even MISQUOTED my review. For some reason he thinks that I said I would not return to Epic just because of this one bad experience, even though I clearly state that I FULLY INTEND to!
Maybe I'm just venting some frustration... I just don't see the point of flaming someone's review when you clearly have no idea what the food tasted like at that time. I'm sure EVERY SINGLE restaurant in the world has served up an ill prepared dish here and there and upset their patrons over it... and I feel that this time around at Epic that was the case.
But, I cannot "review" a restaurant based on what I THINK the food was supposed to taste like, only on what the actual taste was...
Do any of my fellow food bloggers find this problem?
Here's the link to Brent's comments:
http://www.locokinegrindz.com/wordpress/?p=7#comment-38
I know that a lot of folks here have their own private blogs, and I know that soem of them include food review sites. I recently started one of my own, Locokinegrindz, and my first review for Restaurant Epic has received some negative feedback.
My only frustration over the two comments made for my review is that people don't seem to understand that odds are the night I went to eat at Epic there was something off about their preparation. I even say in my respones to their comments that I understand that restaurants have off nights. The last comment made from "Brent" even MISQUOTED my review. For some reason he thinks that I said I would not return to Epic just because of this one bad experience, even though I clearly state that I FULLY INTEND to!
Maybe I'm just venting some frustration... I just don't see the point of flaming someone's review when you clearly have no idea what the food tasted like at that time. I'm sure EVERY SINGLE restaurant in the world has served up an ill prepared dish here and there and upset their patrons over it... and I feel that this time around at Epic that was the case.
But, I cannot "review" a restaurant based on what I THINK the food was supposed to taste like, only on what the actual taste was...
Do any of my fellow food bloggers find this problem?
Here's the link to Brent's comments:
http://www.locokinegrindz.com/wordpress/?p=7#comment-38
Comment