The Fleecing of Hawaii.. and the Nation
What's most disturbing is how consumers are accepting $2.99/gallon regular unleaded gas prices as "cheap".
Wasn't it just 6 months ago that it was over 30% less?
Folks in Hawaii seem especially jaded about sticker shock such as HOUSING, that gas prices are forgiven as just another fact of late 2005 economics.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Have you changed your driving habits?
Collapse
X
-
Re: Simple vs. High Tech
I've thought about picking up an old CRX just for the gas mileage, but with all the modified Hondas around here, i'd give in to my competitive side and start to modify mine.
They are all slow, but it comes down to who has the fastest slow car
But back to V8's now, coasting will help a lot, as will the transmission and gear ratio.
My DD will cruise at 70mph all day long and be in the 2100 RPM range.
If i had the 6 speed manual the RPM's at 70mph would be closer to 1800.
Now if i romp on it, you can just about watch the gas gauge drop
Leave a comment:
-
Simple vs. High Tech
Anyone remember the Honda CRX HF?
Far from a V-8 muscle car, this little 2-seater was sold in the late 80's to early 90's designated as "High Fuel-efficiency". The thing got 45 to 50mpg right off the showroom floor with nothing more than a lightweight compact chassis and an anemic, yet sufficient fuel-injected inline 4-banger. If not mistaken, the max. speed was no more than 85 mph (depending on conditions).
Not bad though for cheap and simple power-to-weight ratio common sense vs. expensive, high tech hybrid (Prius) hoo-haa.
While the HF model was the cheapest model in the CRX line-up, gas prices weren't an issue at the time, so most consumers opted for the higher-powered SI model.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Have you changed your driving habits?
Originally posted by sinjinThis is where I must call BS. What 5.7L V8 gets 30mpg at 65mpg? You'll have to back that one up Alarick. Nothin' personal.
Btw wind resistance is part of aerodynamics.
Unfortunately, I've only managed to get 26 mpg in a Lexus RX 400h, despite it having a 3.3L V6 engine and an electric motor.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Have you changed your driving habits?
A 4 speed automatic with 3.23 gears.
And i'm more than willing to take anyone for a ride with me to show them.
So let me know when your flight comes in, and i'll pick you up at the airport
And in the meantime, i'd suggest doing a little research on unmodified LS1's.
*Edit*
I should probably rephrase myself a bit.
In north Texas where i can drive for hours with out more than a 4 foot change in elevation, i get 30mpg at 70mph.
Here, it's 28-29mpg at over 70.Last edited by Alarick; October 23, 2005, 09:18 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Have you changed your driving habits?
Originally posted by AlarickThat really depends on what car the person is driving.
My daily driver for example will get about 24mpg at speeds under 55mph, but when i drive over 65, it gets 30mpg, and it's a 5.7L V8.
Wind resistance is not so much of a factor as aerodynamics, gear ratio, and engine size are.
Btw wind resistance is part of aerodynamics.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Have you changed your driving habits?
Originally posted by Composite 2992So many drivers spend inordinate amounts of time waiting to get gas at Costco for 15 percent less but drive at speeds that waste 15 percent more gas.
Go figure!
That's right. Due to wind resistance, increasing your speed from 55 to 65 burns about 15 percent more gas. It gets worse if you go even faster. As a rule of thumb, it takes about 4 times more power to go twice as fast.
My daily driver for example will get about 24mpg at speeds under 55mph, but when i drive over 65, it gets 30mpg, and it's a 5.7L V8.
Wind resistance is not so much of a factor as aerodynamics, gear ratio, and engine size are.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Have you changed your driving habits?
Originally posted by kimo55yea. why can't this be like the mainlnad where we can shoot and/or run over inconsiderate people in our way like that!?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Have you changed your driving habits?
legal, not legal, hell... dat don't stop nooobuddy. some o dose peeps in their deathmobiles would sooner shoot ya than lookatcha.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Have you changed your driving habits?
Originally posted by kimo55yea. why can't this be like the mainlnad where we can shoot and/or run over inconsiderate people in our way like that!?
going off now to write my lawmakers ...
Leave a comment:
-
Rubber Neck for Rubbermaid®
Originally posted by cezanneAt Costco Gas... why do I always have to be in the same line that has gramps putting gas in his van and then in 5 gas containers?!
Retailers around the country have also reported abnormally brisk sales of plastic gasoline containers.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Have you changed your driving habits?
yea. why can't this be like the mainlnad where we can shoot and/or run over inconsiderate people in our way like that!?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Have you changed your driving habits?
At Costco Gas... why do I always have to be in the same line that has gramps putting gas in his van and then in 5 gas containers?!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Have you changed your driving habits?
I saw one of those "pricier gas still in the ground tanks" situations today. Shell station on Kamehameha Hwy Pearlridge had $3.19 R/U, while Chevron right across the cross street had $3.03. I still have a 1/4 tank, though, so I didn't bother with it.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Have you changed your driving habits?
While cruising along on the freeway at 60 today I got passed by lots of people going in excess of 65.
So many drivers spend inordinate amounts of time waiting to get gas at Costco for 15 percent less but drive at speeds that waste 15 percent more gas.
Go figure!
That's right. Due to wind resistance, increasing your speed from 55 to 65 burns about 15 percent more gas. It gets worse if you go even faster. As a rule of thumb, it takes about 4 times more power to go twice as fast.
Interesting that these same people slow to less than 55 when there's a cop up ahead. I'll hold steady at 60 and pass them in the center lane.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: