Originally posted by anapuni808
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Obama v. The Birthers
Collapse
X
-
Re: Obama v. The Birthers
-
Re: Obama v. The Birthers
Originally posted by TATTRAT View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Obama v. The Birthers
Originally posted by anapuni808 View PostSG: make sure he shows you the long form one
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Obama v. The Birthers
SG: make sure he shows you the long form one
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Obama v. The Birthers
Originally posted by TATTRAT View PostWill you be my E-wife?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Obama v. The Birthers
Originally posted by Bobinator View PostNow, let's see you answer one of the many questions I posted on this thread.
Sorry we know better.
What? You think no one's paying attention?
You think if you don't answer you can keep this thread going forever?
Or, as I suspect, if you do answer it, and answer it honestly, your whole conspiritorial house of playing cards will crumble to a scrap heap?
Nixon: "I am NOT a liar!"
Clinton: "I never had sex with that woman!"
Bobinator: "_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, so what's YOUR answer?"
We get more truth and honesty from Osama bin Laden than we do from Bobinator.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Obama v. The Birthers
Originally posted by TATTRAT View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Obama v. The Birthers
Originally posted by Bobinator View PostI've been away for a few days.Originally posted by Bobinator View PostNow, let's see you answer one of the many questions I posted on this thread.Originally posted by Bobinator View PostKnowing the truth about our President is hardly frivolous.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Obama v. The Birthers
Originally posted by Bobinator View Post[...]
My concern is for people like you who are completely in the dark about such matters, and are led like sheep to the slaughter, oblivious to what's really going on. [...]
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Obama v. The Birthers
Originally posted by TuNnL View PostHmmm... a new wrinkle in this controversy:
I have to agree with Professor Kato on this one. As much as I think the “birthers” are nuisance with their frivolous inquiries, we must protect at all costs our citizenry’s right to question government as needed. This bill improperly infringes on that.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Obama v. The Birthers
Originally posted by Leo Lakio View PostYep - he ignored the question, as predicted.
The New World Order will have it's way regardless of whether Obama is in office. Getting Obama out of office won't stop the destruction, but it will at least slow it down. And besides, there are more influential people taking action in my stead, and that of millions of Americans.
My concern is for people like you who are completely in the dark about such matters, and are led like sheep to the slaughter, oblivious to what's really going on. People like Obama are empowered by the ignorant masses who will themselves to be blind, so long as they get their suv's, easy money and cozy lifestyle. This is like Babylon and Rome all over again. History indeed repeats itself.
Now, let's see you answer one of the many questions I posted on this thread.Last edited by Bobinator; April 27, 2010, 11:03 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Obama v. The Birthers
Hmmm... a new wrinkle in this controversy:
Anti-‘birther’ bill moves forward
By B.J. Reyes
POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Apr 21, 2010
A proposal aimed at stopping repeated requests for information from so-called "birthers" might also shut out legitimate information requests by the public, says a University of Hawaii professor opposed to the measure.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: