Re: Hawaii's Interisland Air War - Chapter 2
aloha-anon, I realize you probably work for Aloha and would greatly defend the two major incumbents because your livelihood is on the line. And I respect that.
But I think you're mixing two issues up into one. The first issue is Mesa. Everyone who's been paying attention knows Mesa is an airline with a dubious record. And most likely, AQ and HA will get some form of compensation with the court rulings. Even Mesa "supporters" know this. I'm not disputing Mesa's rep and I don't think anyone in this discussion has either.
The other issue is public perception of AQ & HA. People are fed up with the high prices before Mesa started this price war. People didn't like the removal of the coupon system and the lack of inflexibility when it came to switching flights without being slapped fees. So I guess people like dick are asking what's your take on that? Why the one-two punch to the local flying public?
These days, HERO is asking for the local flying public to back AQ & HA up. And we're just asking back, why? Yes, if one of the incumbents were to go under, Mesa would not be a good thing long term for Hawaii. But we don't think AQ & HA is good for us long term either at this point. Maybe you can shed some light on what AQ & HA is trying to do for the local flying public after this debacle is over? If you drive go! out, will the prices go back to what was before?
Yes, some mainland fares are more than what AQ & HA charges but people there have other options, car, greyhound, amtrak. The only other option we have here for now is maybe one personally owns a boat or knows of someone who owns a boat to make the trek across.
aloha-anon, I realize you probably work for Aloha and would greatly defend the two major incumbents because your livelihood is on the line. And I respect that.
But I think you're mixing two issues up into one. The first issue is Mesa. Everyone who's been paying attention knows Mesa is an airline with a dubious record. And most likely, AQ and HA will get some form of compensation with the court rulings. Even Mesa "supporters" know this. I'm not disputing Mesa's rep and I don't think anyone in this discussion has either.
The other issue is public perception of AQ & HA. People are fed up with the high prices before Mesa started this price war. People didn't like the removal of the coupon system and the lack of inflexibility when it came to switching flights without being slapped fees. So I guess people like dick are asking what's your take on that? Why the one-two punch to the local flying public?
These days, HERO is asking for the local flying public to back AQ & HA up. And we're just asking back, why? Yes, if one of the incumbents were to go under, Mesa would not be a good thing long term for Hawaii. But we don't think AQ & HA is good for us long term either at this point. Maybe you can shed some light on what AQ & HA is trying to do for the local flying public after this debacle is over? If you drive go! out, will the prices go back to what was before?
Yes, some mainland fares are more than what AQ & HA charges but people there have other options, car, greyhound, amtrak. The only other option we have here for now is maybe one personally owns a boat or knows of someone who owns a boat to make the trek across.
Comment